Research Article
Print
Research Article
The first Permian Diaphanopterodea (Insecta, Megasecopteromorpha) from China
expand article infoNan Yang‡, Yingying Cui§, Ziqiang Xu‡, Yanqi Xu|, Dong Ren‡, Olivier Béthoux
‡ Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
§ South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
| Geological Survey of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu, China
¶ Sorbonne Université, Paris, France

Corresponding author: Yingying Cui ( cuiying19860105@gmail.com )

Corresponding author: Dong Ren ( rendong@mail.cnu.edu.cn )

Academic editor: Hui-ting Wu
© 2024 Nan Yang, Yingying Cui, Ziqiang Xu, Yanqi Xu, Dong Ren, Olivier Béthoux.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Yang N, Cui Y, Xu Z, Xu Y, Ren D, Béthoux O (2024) The first Permian Diaphanopterodea (Insecta, Megasecopteromorpha) from China. Fossil Record 27(2): 247-258. https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.27.e128892
ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E93DEB3D-DFFF-4BE5-8B06-E79DB3F271F7
Open Access

Abstract

A new Diaphanopterodea (Insecta, Palaeoptera, Megasecopteromorpha), Sinoelmoa yangquanensis gen. et sp. nov., is described based on a single specimen discovered from the Shuiquan Gully locality (Shanxi For­­mation; Permian, Cisuralian, Asselian; China). A broad comparative analysis of the wing venation of the known members of the diaphanopterodean families Parelmoidae and Elmoidae allowed assigning the new taxon to the former family. This new occurrence represents the first record of a Permian Diaphanopterodea from China, and both the earliest and most oriental record for the Parelmoidae. It sheds new light on the distribution and diversity of these extinct taxa.

Key Words

Asselian, Cisuralian, China, Diaphanopterodea, Fossil insect, North China Block, Parelmoidae

Introduction

The insect order Diaphanopterodea, a member of the broader taxon Megasecopteromorpha Béthoux, 2020 in Yang et al. (2020), is a particular member of Late Palaeozoic faunas. Compared with other megasecopteromorphan lineages, it is represented by fewer species and fossil specimens. The capacity of these insects to hold wings backwards, along the abdomen, at rest (‘neoptery’) has long been considered a distinctive feature of the group (Carpenter 1992). Different opinions emerged as to whether the occurrence of this ability, in such ancient insects, should be regarded as the ancestral condition for the entire winged insects, or should be accounted for by convergent acquisitions, within Megasecopteromorpha and within Neoptera (Yang et al. 2020; and references therein). The latter hypothesis is now generally accepted. Also, in the course of their 75 million years of evolution, the group evolved very small forms, with a very reduced wing venation (Carpenter 1992) reminiscent of that of Hymenoptera.

One of the best documented families is the Parelmoidae Rohdendorf, 1962, composed of various Cisuralian (i.e. lower Permian) genera and species from Czech Republic (Obora; Sakmarian), USA (Elmo & Midco; Artinskian), France (Lodève; Kungurian) and Russian Federation (Chekarda; Kungurian). Here, we describe a new, isolated wing discovered from the Shuiquan Gully, Shanxi Formation (China; Asselian), which can be confidently assigned to this family. Our broad comparative analysis suggests that it belongs to a previously unknown genus and species. It constitutes the first record of Permian Diaphanopterodea from China.

Material and method

Geological setting

The new material (specimen YQZYW 15) was collected from the siltstone layer of the middle Shanxi Fm., in a rock profile at Duanjiabei District, Yanquan, Shanxi Province, North China (Fig. 1A–C). The Shanxi Fm. (also spelled ‘Shansi’ in some accounts) is a set of deposits of continental–oceanic interaction facies, mainly consisting of coal, mudstone, siltstone, and sandstone, which conformably overlies the Taiyuan Fm. and conformably underlies the Xiashihezi Fm. (Fig. 1D). The upper part of the fossiliferous layer is blackish grey and contains some invertebrates, such as brachiopods and gastropods, while the lower part is grey with abundant plant fossils, including Neuropteris ovata, Pecopteris orientalis, Pecopteris linsiana, Pecopteris sp., Sphenopteris nystroemii, Sphenopteris sp. and Cordaites sp. (Fig. 1D) (Wu 1997). The newly described insect specimen was collected from the lower layer. Based on lithological characters, this layer likely belongs to the Shanxi Fm., which is Asselian in age (Permian, Cisuralian; Shen S. et al. 2020; Shen B. et al. 2022).

Figure 1. 

Geographic and stratigraphic information on the Shuiquan Gully locality (red triangle). A–C. Location of the collecting site, on A. The palaeogeographic map of early Permian (Cisuralien); B. The map of Shanxi Province, China; C. The map of Shuiquan Gully locality, Yangquan City. D. Chronological framework of the Early Permian strata according to Shen S. et al. (2020), Shen B. et al. (2022) and Sun et al. (2022), with indication of the fossil horizon (abbreviations: HSL, Houshi Limestone; QSL, Qianshi Limestone; SJSL, Sijieshi Limestone). Scale bars: 150 km (B); 1 km (C). The palaeogeographic map of early Permian (Cisuralien), redrawn by A. Lethiers (CR2P, Paris, from reconstruction by R. Blakey. All Chinese maps data source, Tianditu (www.tianditu.gov.cn, 2024/05/08).

Documentation of fossil material

The new material (specimen YQZYW 15) is housed at Yangquan City Planning and Natural Resources Bureau (Geological Specimen Room). It was photographed using a Nikon SMZ25, and a Canon 5DS coupled with a Canon MP-E 65 mm macro lens, under both dry and ethanol conditions. Photographs of this specimen reproduced herein are the result of a combination of photographs taken under both dry (best-preserved side) and ethanol conditions (both sides) (‘eth-eth-dry’ composite).

New photographs of material housed at the Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ; Cambridge, MA, USA) were provided by the MCZ staff. A photograph of the specimen PIN 1700/492 (Paleontological Institute, Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia; part of Fig. 2F) was provided by Anastasia Felker. All photographs were optimized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, California, USA).

Figure 2. 

Wing venation of representatives of Parelmoidae Rohdendorf, 1962. A–D. Representatives of the genus Parelmoa Carpenter, 1947. A. Parelmoa revelata Carpenter, 1947, holotype, specimen MCZ 4822, drawing of right forewing and photograph (positive imprint, light-mirrored). B, C. Parelmoa radialis Carpenter, 1947. B. Holotype, specimen MCZ 4825, drawing of left forewing and photograph (negative imprint, flipped horizontally, light-mirrored). C. Paratype, specimen MCZ 4824, drawing of left forewing and photograph (negative imprint, flipped horizontally). D. Parelmoa obtusa Carpenter, 1947, holotype, specimen MCZ 4823, drawing of left forewing and photograph (composite of both sides). E. Pseudelmoa ampla Carpenter, 1947, holotype, specimen MCZ 4826, drawing of right forewing and photograph (positive imprint). F. Permuralia maculata (Kukalová-Peck & Sinichenkova, 1992), paratype, specimen PIN 1700/492, drawing of right forewing and photograph (negative imprint). Photographs of MCZ material, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, ©President and Fellows of Harvard College, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; photograph of PIN specimen, courtesy A. Felker.

New photographic data on the specimen Ld LAP 365 (Musée of Lodève, France) were also collected. Two reflectance transformation imaging (RTI) files were generated based on photographs taken using a ~30 cm diameter, automated light dome driving a Canon EOS 5DS digital camera, itself coupled to a Canon MP-E 65 mm macro lens. The first file provides an overview of the side Ld LAP 365a, while the second file is focused on the wing base of the side Ld LAP 365b (each based on a set of 42 photographs). Original photographs were optimized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 prior to RTI processing, itself achieved using the RTI builder software (Cultural Heritage Imaging). We provide an online Dryad dataset (Yang et al. 2024, forthcoming) containing these RTI files. Images (other than drawings) reproduced on Fig. 5 were extracted from the overview RTI file, the second item having been obtained using the ‘normals visualisation’ mode, which assigns a colour code to each pixel according to the orientation of the vector perpendicular to the plane tangent to the object at the corresponding point. This extract was optimized for contrast.

In addition to photographs, hand-drafted drawings were also produced. For the MCZ material such drawings were prepared using an unspecified dissecting microscope equipped with a drawing tube; for the specimen Ld LAP 365, hand-drafted drawings were prepared using a Zeiss SteREO Discovery V8 Stereomicroscope equipped with a pair of W-PL 10×/23 eye pieces, a Plan Apo S 1.× FWD objective, and a drawing tube (Jena, Germany); and for the specimen YQZYW 15, hand-drafted drawings were prepared using a Leica MZ75 equipped with a drawing tube. Final drawings were then prepared using both draft drawings and photographs. For the specimen PIN 1700/492, a drawing was derived from photographs only.

Terminology

We follow the serial insect wing venation groundplan and the associated wing venation nomenclature (Lameere 1922, 1923; Kukalová-Peck 1991). Abbreviations are repeated for convenience: ScA, Subcosta anterior; ScP, Subcosta posterior; R, Radius; RA, Radius anterior; RP, Radius posterior; M, Media; MA, Media anterior; MP, Media posterior; Cu, Cubitus; CuA, Cubitus anterior; CuP, Cubitus posterior; AA, Analis anterior; AP, Analis posterior. The identification of AP veins must be regarded as tentative, as the corresponding veins are convex.

Systematic Palaeontology

Class Insecta Linnaeus, 1758

Taxon Rostropalaeoptera Kukalová-Peck, 2000 in Wootton & Kukalová-Peck (2000)

Taxon Megasecopteromorpha Béthoux, 2020 in Yang et al. (2020)

Diaphanopterodea Handlirsch, 1906

Remarks

Commonly among Megasecopteromorpha, and more particularly in Diaphanopterodea, MA shows some degree of connection with RP. It ranges from a connection via a strong cross-vein, shortly after the origin of MA, to a full fusion with R, then continuing along RP, from which MA diverges at some stage. Because Diaphanopterodea also exhibit oblique cross-veins, it can sometimes be difficult to determine whether an oblique structure occurring between RP and MP is the genuine MA or a cross-vein. Unlike previous authors (Carpenter 1963, 1992; Béthoux and Nel 2003), Prokop and Kukalová-Peck (2017) suggested that a full fusion of MA with R/RP occurred in Diaphanoptera Brongniart, 1893, the type-genus of the family from which the names of the order derives. These authors based their interpretation on vein elevation as observed in the specimen MNHN.F.R51214, holotype of Diaphanoptera munieri Brongniart, 1893. However, our observation reveals that rock compression this particular specimen experienced (like several other Commentry specimens) makes it impossible to derive a solid inference on the elevation of elements attributable to MA. In contrast, the specimen MNHN.F.R51196 [considered conspecific to the specimen MNHN.F.R51214 by Béthoux and Nel (2003)] is better preserved in that respect. Our observation revealed that the structure regarded as the base of MA by Béthoux and Nel (2003) and as a cross-vein by Prokop and Kukalová-Peck (2017) is indeed concave, while MA is convex distal to the point where it diverges from RP. This difference in elevation underlies the argument by Prokop and Kukalová-Peck (2017). However, an elevation shift, applying to both MA and CuA, is a general feature of the broader taxon Rostropalaeoptera (Béthoux 2008). Most decisively, in Eukulojidae, whose wings lack cross-venation, the then undisputable bases of MA and CuA are both concave for a short distance before turning convex, after having approached RP and M, respectively (Béthoux 2008: fig. 3). The assumption that MA is fused very early with R/RP in Diaphanoptera is therefore unsubstantiated.

Figure 3. 

Wing venation of Elmoa trisecta Tillyard, 1937 (Elmoidae Tillyard, 1937). A. Specimen MCZ 4590, drawing of left forewing and photograph (negative imprint, reversed, light-mirrored). B. Specimen MCZ 4593, drawing of right forewing and photograph (negative imprint, light-mirrored). C. Specimen MCZ 4606, drawing of right forewing and photograph (negative imprint, flipped horizontally). D. Specimen MCZ 4592, drawing of right forewing (positive imprint). E. Specimen MCZ 4591, drawing of wings and photograph (positive imprint). F. Specimen MCZ 4594, drawing of left forewing and photograph (positive imprint). Abbreviations: LFW, left forewing; LHW, left hind wing; RFW, right forewing; RHW, right hind wing. All photographs, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, ©President and Fellows of Harvard College, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Parelmoidae Rohdendorf, 1962

Type genus

Parelmoa Carpenter, 1947.

Included genera

Diapha Kukalová-Peck, 1974; Elmodiapha Kukalová-Peck, 1974; Paradiapha Kukalová-Peck, 1974; Permelmoa Prokop & Nel, 2011; Permodiapha Kukalová-Peck, 1974; Permuralia Sinichenkova & Kukalová-Peck, 1997; Protodiapha Kukalová-Peck, 1974; Pseudelmoa Carpenter, 1947; Stenodiapha Kukalová-Peck, 1974; Sinoelmoa gen. nov.

Commented diagnosis

ScP long, ending beyond the first fork of RP (plesiomorphy within Diaphanopterodea); near wing base, shortly after its origin, CuA fused for some distance with, or running closely along, R+M (apomorphy; as currently documented, shared with all Diaphanopterodea except Sinodiaphidae, in which CuA is connected with M by a short cross-vein, and Diaphanopteridae, in which the connection of CuA and M is very brief); first cross-vein in the CuA–CuP area very short and oblique, with CuA displaying a clear inflexion at the point of connection with this cross-vein [also present in Diaphanopteridae, Carrizodiaphanoptera and, to some extent, Elmoidae (Fig. 3); possibly an apomorphy of the entire Diaphanopterodea –except for Sinodiaphidae, in which this state is primarily absent–, and with presumed secondary losses in various families, such as Martynoviidae]; MP branched (plesiomorphy within Diaphanopterodea); CuP with 1–3 distal branches (plesiomorphy within Diaphanopterodea); developed anal area (putative apomorphy for the family).

Remarks

The combination of (i) an overall rich venation, (ii) a long fusion of CuA with R+M (or, CuA running very close to R+M for some distance), and (iii) a cua-cup cross-vein very short, is generally used to identify members of the Parelmoidae. The Pennsylvanian Diaphanopteridae differ from this family only by lacking character state (ii) (see Béthoux and Nel 2003). Given the polarity of several character states listed as diagnostic of the family, it is not excluded that this taxonomic concept might represent a paraphyletic entity, to include other Diaphanopterodea families, such as Elmoidae.

Carpenter (1992) considered the six genera and 10 species reported from the Obora locality (Permian, Cisuralian, Sakmarian), and originally assigned to the Elmoidae or Parelmoidae (Kukalová-Peck 1974), as of uncertain Parelmoidael affinities. Addressing aspects of species delimitation, and the systematics of these species, is made difficult by post-depositional deformations this material endured. Nevertheless, wing venation character states they display tend to indicate a placement to the family Parelmoidae as delimited above, in particular the well-developed anal area. Also, despite deformation, this comparatively large sample allows appreciating variation in character states variability (in other words, how the extent of variability varies within families), likely to differ among (and within) the closely related families Diaphanopteridae, Parelmoidae and Elmoidae (see below and Kukalová-Peck and Sinichenkova 1992).

Notably, a distal fork of CuP is common in the Obora material, with some specimens displaying an early fork, and even a 3-branched CuP. The relation between RP and MA is also very variable across the corresponding species, ranging from a complete lack of fusion to a long one. In contrast, species of the genus Parelmoa Carpenter, 1947 (Fig. 2A–D) show more stable venational features (CuP simple; MA and RP connected by a short cross-vein). Among other Parelmoidae, the monotypic genera Pseudelmoa Carpenter 1947 (Fig. 2E) and Permuralia Sinichenkova & Kukalová-Peck, 1997 (Fig. 2F) remain similar to Parelmoa spp. in most of their venational features. Also, Elmoa trisecta Tillyard, 1937 (Elmoidae; Fig. 3) shows rather stable venational features, with a consistent occurrence of a (i) distally forked CuP and (ii) a MA distinct from RP, with a cross-vein connecting the two veins shortly after the origin of the latter. The Obora material is therefore unusual in several respects. Instead of attempting to finely resolve relationships between the corresponding taxa, whose variability in many aspects cannot be properly appreciated, we believe it is more sensible to use the Parelmoidae as a broad taxonomic concept, possibly paraphyletic (i.e., a grade), to include the Obora material.

Sinoelmoa Yang, Cui, Xu & Béthoux, gen. nov.

https://zoobank.org/3FA908E9-C520-454C-8FE0-1A4F1909C0BF

Type species

Sinoelmoa yangquanensis Yang, Cui, Xu & Béthoux, sp. nov.

Etymology

Named after the ancient Greek prefix Sino- (China), and the genus Elmoa.

Species included

Type species only.

Diagnosis

By monotypy, same as for the type species.

Sinoelmoa yangquanensis Yang, Cui, Xu & Béthoux, sp. nov.

https://zoobank.org/541893E5-C3B2-42FB-A772-14B700882B0D
Fig. 4

Type material

YQZYW 15, part and counterpart.

Etymology

Named after the Yangquan city where the Shuiquan Gully locality is located.

Type locality

The specimen was collected at the Shuiquan Gully locality; Shanxi Formation, Permian, Cisuralian, Asselian (Shen S. et al. 2020; Shen B. et al. 2022); near Yangquan City, Shanxi Province, China.

Diagnosis

Area between anterior wing margin and R/RA dark; ScP vanishing in the area between anterior margin and R/RA; MA/MP split opposite the RA/RP split (as opposed to MA/MP split well distal of RA/RP split); CuP forked; AA long (as opposed to AA short), ending on posterior margin beyond wing mid-length.

Description

Positive and negative imprints of a right forewing, distal part missing; dark area between anterior margin and R/RA; near wing base, preserved anterior wing margin very oblique, suggestive of the presence of a short portion of ScA distinct from the anterior wing margin (see Fig. 4A); ScP vanishing in the area between the anterior wing margin and RA, just beyond the brief RP-MA connection; stem of R+M convex, with a distinct inflexion opposite the point of separation of R and M (located about 3.6 mm distal from wing base); RA convex, simple and strong, parallel to anterior wing margin; RP posteriorly pectinate, with 3 simple branches preserved; MA/MP split opposite the RA/RP split; MA diverging anteriorly and then shortly connected with RP; MA simple; MP forked distally; short Cu stem visible; CuA diverging anteriorly from Cu, then close and parallel to R+M stem for some distance, suddenly diverging posteriorly, slightly basal to the R/M split; CuA simple; CuP forked distally; CuA–CuP area narrow until the first cross-vein occurring in this area, which is short and strong, located slightly distal to MA/MP split; anal area very well-developed, with a total of eight terminal branches (anterior-most branch, presumably AA, with 3 terminal branches); cross-veins difficult to observe, evenly distributed over the whole wing, forming two gradate series.

Figure 4. 

Sinoelmoa yangquanensis gen. et sp. nov., holotype, specimen YQZYW 15. A. Overview, drawing and photograph (dry-eth-eth composite; dashed line delimiting the area missing on side a) of right forewing. B. Detail of the course of CuA, drawing and photograph (eth-eth-dry composite), as located in A.

Measurements

Preserved wing length 15.4 mm, width 5.5 mm.

Systematic placement

The presence of a very short cua-cup cross-vein allows assigning the new specimen to the Diaphanopterodea and, within this taxon, allows excluding affinities with the Sinodiaphidae. Furthermore, the derived state ‘long fusion of CuA with R+M (or, CuA running very close to R+M for some distance)’ allows excluding the new material from the Diaphanopteridae. Then, an assignment to the Parelmoidae as delimited above is straightforward. Nevertheless, a possible assignment to the family Elmoidae was also considered. Two main character states allow distinguishing members of this family (Fig. 3) from the Parelmoidae (Fig. 2), namely (1) an anal area narrow, with a simple AA (Fig. 3A, B, C, E), sometimes with a short AP-like vein (Fig. 3D, F) (as opposed to a well-developed anal area, with numerous long veins, in Parelmoidae); and (2) ScP terminating on RA near the basal third of the wing length (as opposed to distal to the wing mid-length, in Parelmoidae). Even though the termination of ScP is not visible in the new material, it is clearly not directed towards RA at the point where it vanishes, which is already distal to the point where it reaches RA in Elmoidae. The assignment of our new material to the Elmoidae can therefore be excluded.

Within the Parelmoidae, the extent of the AA area is a useful character to consider first. This area is distinctively long in the new material, a state shared with Elmodiapha (see Kukalová-Peck 1974, text-figs 1, 2), from Obora (Czech Republic; Cisuralian, Sakmarian), and Parelmoa (Fig. 2A–D) and Pseudelmoa (Fig. 2E), from the Elmo & Midco localities (Kansas, Oklahoma, USA; Cisuralian, Artinskian). However, the MA/MP split is located well distal of the RA/RP split in these three genera, whereas they are at the same level in new material. The new material further differs from Parelmoa, Pseudelmoa and Elmodiapha by the brief connection of RP and MA (the two veins are distinct in the three genera) and the presence of a forked CuP (this vein is simple in the three genera). Incidentally, in addition to differences in the extent of the AA area, the same characters allow excluding affinities with the genus Permuralia (Fig. 2F; Chekarda, Russian Federation; Cisuralian, Kungurian; and see Kukalová-Peck and Sinichenkova 1992), in which RP and MA are fused for a more or less long distance, and CuP is simple.

Permelmoa magnifica Prokop & Nel, 2011, from the Lodève locality (France; Cisuralian, Kungurian), is also currently assigned to Parelmoidae. To better assess the affinities of the new material we carried out new observations of the material of this species (Fig. 5; and see Yang et al. 2024). In contrast with Prokop and Nel (2011), we observed that (i) RP has four branches (as opposed to three); that (ii) CuA runs close to (or is fused with) R+M for a short distance, and then sharply diverge posteriorly from the R+M stem, just basal of the first split of this stem, a character generally occurring in Parelmoidae (Fig. 2) and Elmoidae (Fig. 3) (and see Carpenter 1943, 1947, 1992); that (iii) the first fork of MP is located distally [the basal portion of the stem regarded by Prokop and Nel (2011) as the first posterior stem of MP (long dotted line on Fig. 5A) is herein regarded as a twin, shifted impression of CuA, because (i) the apical part of the wing is preserved as a shifted impression, on a layer different from the rest of the wing (Fig. 5A), (ii) the elevation of this vein portion is inconsistent with an assignment to MP and (iii) such twin imprints have already been documented for Lodève material (Béthoux et al. 2007: p. 185; and O.B. pers. obs.) but also from other fossil localities (e.g., see Béthoux 2015); it may be the consequence of delamination and then shifting of the two epidermic layers composing the wing, or of multiple impressions implying a release from the sediment, displacement, and second impression of a single wing, a phenomenon yet to be demonstrated experimentally], this being consistent with previous reports on the wing morphology of Parelmoidae and Elmoidae (Figs 2, 3; and see Kukalová-Peck 1974); and (iv) despite a very incomplete preservation, it can be assessed that CuA and CuP, distal to their respective origins, approximate each other before departing, and are therefore most likely connected by a short, oblique cua-cup cross-vein known in Diaphanopteridae, Parelmoidae and Elmoidae (see above). Additionally, we propose homology conjectures alternative to those followed by Prokop and Nel (2011) regarding the MA/MP split. These authors adopted a traditional interpretation (Fig. 5B) involving a free stem of M splitting into MA and MP near the origin of RP. However, this implies the presence of a very strong, oblique cross-vein between RA and RP (* on Fig. 5B), unknown in other Parelmoidea and Elmoidae. A possible alternative interpretation (Fig. 5C) predicts that the MA/MP split occurs at the point where R and M diverge, and that MA runs fused with R for some distance. The ‘strong oblique cross-vein’ can then be interpreted as the base of RP (* in Fig. 5C). Incidentally, RP and MA are then connected by a strong cross-vein, as is commonly the case in Parelmoidae and Elmoidae. However, the first cross-vein in the MA–MP area is then located in a more basal position than is usually the case in these families, but this can be legitimately related to the more basal position of the MA/MP split. It must be emphasized that a R+MA common stem has already been advocated for Permuralia sharovi (Kukalová-Peck and Sinichenkova 1992) (although a free base of MA is still present) and is admitted for several other members of the order Diaphanopterodea (see Prokop and Kukalová-Peck 2017: text-figs 4, 6; and in Asthenohymenidae Tillyard, 1924 and Martynoviidae Tillyard, 1932). Following this interpretation, and in conjunction with a very long ScP, Permelmoa magnifica stands out as a very unique Parelmoidae. Regardless of the favoured interpretation on the course of MA, the new material differs from Permelmoa magnifica in many respects, including the respective position of the RA/RP and MA/MP split, the extent of ScP, and the extent of the AA area.

Figure 5. 

Wing venation of Permelmoa magnifica Prokop & Nel, 2011 (Parelmoidae Rohdendorf, 1962), holotype specimen Ld LAP 365, right forewing. A. Interpretative drawing under interpretation favoured herein (dotted line, twin imprints of vein sections; and see text), photograph (RTI extract), and normals visualization (RTI extract). B, C. Detail of the radial and median systems, as located in A, under the interpretation followed by Prokop and Nel (2011) (B) and the interpretation favoured herein (C).

In summary, it is legitimate to erect a new genus and species for the new material.

Discussion

Thanks to its good preservation, the material of Sinoelmoa yangquanensis gen. et sp. nov. allows addressing some uncertainty of the course of main veins near the wing base in Diaphanopterodea. Except for the Sinodiaphidae and Diaphanopteridae, the area between the Cu stem and R+M is very narrow in these insects; and, concurrently, the distal free portion of CuA clearly diverge in the close vicinity of the split of R+M (into R and M). Up to now, this situation made it difficult to clearly assess whether the entire stem of Cu, or CuA only, fuses with R+M (and, if so, at which point the (R+M)+CuA fusion takes place). In the newly described specimen a Cu stem independent from R+M is clearly visible; and a simple CuA diverges from it, runs along R+M for some distance, and then diverges abruptly opposite the bending of R+M, just basal of the R/M split (Fig. 4B). This new observation overturns the assumption of the occurrence of a R+M+Cu/CuA early common stem (or, of a CuA/CuP split located at the wing base) in these insects, and instead corroborates previous observations of a more or less brief connection of CuA with R+M (or M alone; see Kukalová-Peck 1974: fig. 10; Kukalová-Peck and Sinichenkova 1992). Furthermore, it suggests that the CuA/CuP split being located opposite the point where CuP patently diverges posteriorly is a general feature of Diaphanopterodea (except for Sinodiaphidae and Diaphanopteridae), and is likely the case in more specialized families in which R+M and Cu cannot be easily distinguished, such as Martynoviidae and Asthenohymenidae. It can be reasonably assumed that it is also the case in the megasecopteran family Protohymenidae, which acquired an ‘Astenohymenidae’ habitus convergently.

The discovery of Sinoelmoa yangquanensis gen. et sp. nov. has also relevance regarding the age and distribution of the Parelmoidae. Being Asselian in age, it composes the earliest occurrence of the family, but also the most oriental one, along the eastern margin of the Palaeothetys, on the North China Block. This new record suggests that these rather infrequent insects may have had a large distribution, at least along the lower latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C., D.R. and O.B.; investigation, N.Y., Z.X., Y.X. and O.B.; resources, D.R.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C., N.Y. and O.B.; writing—review and editing, Y.C., N.Y., D.R. and O.B.; visualization, Y.C., N.Y., Z.X. and O.B.; supervision, Y.C.; project administration, Y.C.; funding acquisition, Y.C., D.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Markus Poschmann (Direktion Landesarchäologie/Erdgeschichtliche, Koblenz) and Pavel Sroka (Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice) for their constructive comments and to the editorial board of Fossil Record for handling the reviewing process. We are grateful to Zhijun Bai (Geological Hazard Prevention and Control Center of Yangquan City) for collecting the holotype and providing the paleogeographic information composing Fig. 1; to Stéphane Fouché (Musée of Lodève, Lodève) for allowing the loan of the specimen Ld LAP 365, and to Anne-Laure Decombeix and Mélanie Debiais-Thibaud (UMR AMAP, Monptellier) for managing its transfer to the MNHN; to Anastasia Felker and Nina Dmitrievna (Paleontological Institute, Moscow) for providing photos of the specimen PIN 1700/492; to the Museum of Comparative Zoology and Harvard University for allowing the reproduction of copyrighted material; to A. Lethiers (CR2P) for providing the palaeogeographic map of early Permian (Cisuralian); to the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin for the publication free waiver. This work was supported by the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202102080271), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42272004, No. 32020103006).

References

  • Béthoux O (2008) Groundplan, nomenclature, homology, phylogeny, and the question of the insect wing venation pattern. Alavesia 2: 219–232.
  • Béthoux O (2015) The Late Carboniferous Triplosoba pulchella is not a fly in the ointment but a stem-mayfly. Systematic Entomology 40: 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12103
  • Béthoux O, Nel A, Schneider JW, Gand G (2007) Lodetiella magnifica nov. gen. and nov. sp. (Insecta: Palaeodictyoptera; Permian), an extreme situation in wing morphology of palaeopterous insects. Geobios 40: 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2006.04.001
  • Brongniart C (1893) Recherches pour servir à l’histoire des insectes fossiles des temps primaires précédées d’une étude sur la nervation des ailes des insectes. Bulletin de la Société d’Industrie Minérale de Saint-Etienne (3) 7: 124–615. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.65984
  • Carpenter FM (1943) The Lower Permian insects of Kansas. Part 9. The orders Neuroptera, Raphidiodea, Caloneurodea and Prothortoptera (Prosbnisidae), with additional Protodonata and Megasecoptera. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 75: 55–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/20023450
  • Carpenter FM (1947) Lower Permian insects from Oklahoma. Part 1. Introduction and the orders Megasecoptera, Protodonata, and Odonata. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 76: 25–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/20023497
  • Carpenter FM (1963) Studies on Carboniferous Insects from Commentry, France: Part V. The genus Diaphanoptera and the order Diaphanopterodea. Psyche 70: 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1155/1963/59263
  • Carpenter FM (1992) Superclass Hexapoda. In: Kaesler RL (Ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. The Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Boulder, [xxii +] 655 pp.
  • Handlirsch A (1906) Die fossilen Insekten und die Phylogenie der rezenten Formen, parts I–IV. In: Handlirsch A (Ed.) Ein Handbuch für Paläontologen und Zoologen. Verlag Von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1–640.
  • Kukalová-Peck J (1974) Wing-folding in the Paleozoic insect order Diaphanopterodea (Paleoptera), with a description of new representatives of the family Elmoidae. Psyche 81: 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1155/1974/49489
  • Kukalová-Peck J (1991) Fossil History and the Evolution of Hexapod Structures. In: Naumann ID, Crane PB, Lawrence JF, Nielsen ES, Spradbery JP, Taylor RW, Whitten MJ, Littlejohn MJ (Eds) The Insects of Australia, a textbook for students and research workers (2nd edition). Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia, 141–179.
  • Kukalová-Peck J, Sinichenkova ND (1992) The wing venation and systematics of Lower Permian Diaphanopterodea from the Ural Mountains, Russia (Insecta, Paleoptera). Canadian Journal of Zoology 70: 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1139/z92-036
  • Lameere A (1922) Sur la nervation alaire des insectes. Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences de l’Académie Royale de Belgique 8: 138–149.
  • Linnaeus C (1758) Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm, 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542
  • Prokop J, Kukalová-Peck J (2017) New insects from the earliest Permian of Carrizo Arroyo (New Mexico, USA) bridging the gap between the Carboniferous and Permian entomofaunas. Insect Systematics Evolution 48: 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-48022160
  • Prokop J, Nel A (2011) New Middle Permian palaeopteran insects from Lodève Basin in southern France (Ephemeroptera, Diaphanopterodea, Megasecoptera). Zookeys 130: 41–55. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.130.1311
  • Rohdendorf BB (1962) Podtip Mandibulata zhvalonosnye chlenistonogie [Subphylum Mandibulata or Prototracheata] In: Rohdendorf BB (Ed.) Osnovy Paleontologii [Fundamentals of Palaeontology]. Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, 17–374.
  • Shen B, Shen S, Wu Q, Zhang S, Zhang B, Wang X, Hou Z, Yuan D, Zhang Y, Liu F, Liu J, Zhang H, Shi Y, Wang J, Feng Z (2022) Carboniferous and Permian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of North China Block. Science China Earth Sciences 65: 983–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-021-9909-9
  • Shen S, Xu H, Yuan D, Wang Y, Wang J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Mou L, Wu Q (2020) Permian stratigraphy and index fossils of China. Zhejiang University Press, 382 pp.
  • Sinichenkova ND, Kukalová-Peck J (1997) Permuralia – a new name for Uralia Kukalová-Peck and Sinichenkova, 1992 (Insecta: Diaphanopterida = Diaphanopteridea). Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 31: 95.
  • Sun S, Chen A, Chen H, Hou M, Yang S, Xu S, Wang F, Huang Z, Ogg JG (2022) Early Permian chemical weathering indices and paleoclimate transition linked to the end of the coal-forming episode, Diaphanopterodeas Basin, North China Craton. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 585: 110743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110743
  • Tillyard RJ (1937) Kansas Permian Insects. Part 17. The order Megasecoptera and additions to the Palaeodictyoptera, Odonata, Protoperlaria, Copeognatha and Neuroptera. American Journal of Science (5) 33: 81–110. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.s5-33.194.81
  • Wu T (1997) Stratigraphy (Lithostratic) of Shanxi Province. China University of Geosciences Press, Wuhan, 382 pp.
  • Yang N, Ren D, Béthoux O (2020) The ‘Megasecoptera–Diaphanopterodea’ twilight zone epitomised by a new insect from Xiaheyan (Early Pennsylvanian; China). Alcheringa 44: 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03115518.2020.1737228
  • Yang N, Cui Y, Xu Z, Xu Y, Ren D, Béthoux O (2024) Data from: The first Permian Diaphanopterodea (Insecta, Megasecopteromorpha) from China. Dryad Digital Repository.
login to comment