Research Article
Print
Research Article
New findings of Prototherium ausetanum (Mammalia, Pan-Sirenia) from paving stones in Girona (Catalonia, Spain)?
expand article infoManja Voss§, Oliver Hampe|, Kristin Mahlow, Joan C. Vilanova
‡ Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Berlin, Germany
§ Leibniz-Institut zur Analyse des Biodiversitätswandels, Hamburg, Germany
| Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
¶ University of Girona, Girona, Spain
Open Access

Abstract

Taxonomic and morphological approaches on Eocene sirenians from Catalonia (Spain) benefit from a newly discovered specimen found in a quite unusual locality, the pedestrian zone in the city of Girona. Two fossil-bearing limestone slabs from middle Eocene (Bartonian) layers of a quarry in the wider surrounding area north-west of Barcelona, were CT-scanned in the Clínica Girona to enhance more detailed investigations. Post-processing of the scans and, as far as possible, 3D-reconstruction of the preserved elements in the slabs was performed at Museum für Naturkunde Berlin. Thereby, a skull of a Dugong specimen was used as a reference point. Based on the combined analysis of macroscopic and CT-data, the specimen most likely represents Prototherium ausetanum Balaguer & Alba, 2016 and complements the available information of the holotype and hitherto only known specimen of that species. The Girona specimen is an adult, but small individual that corroborates P. ausetanum as a generally small-sized species compared to other known Prototherium taxa.

Key Words

3D-visualisation, CT-scanning, Eocene, morphology, taxonomy, urban fossil

Introduction

In a preceding study (Voss et al. 2019), one of the oldest sirenian remains in Europe found under peculiar circumstances was introduced to the scientific community and the wider audience of citizen scientists and the general public interested in geological heritage and geotourism.

Two limestone slabs from the late middle Eocene of Sant Vicenç de Castellet (Catalonia, NE Spain, Fig. 1) were once processed in a pedestrian pavement in the city of Girona and were recently detected to contain remains of an extinct sirenian, a large, herbivorous marine mammal. Based on macroscopic investigations and first CT-data, the fossil find could be confirmed as belonging to a single specimen (Voss et al. 2019). As such, it is a particularly lucky circumstance that the two fossil-bearing slabs have been placed precisely next to each other. Furthermore, Voss et al. (2019) could limit the relative age of the specimen and its taxonomic identity. Mainly judging from the dental formula, this sea cow material represents a young adult belonging to the genus Prototherium.

Figure 1. 

Panoramic view of the SW side of the limestone quarry southeast of Sant Vicenç de Castellet showing the massive blocks of Bartonian carbonates bound by micritic matrix, and containing besides macroforaminifers, such as nummulites and discocyclinids, bryozoans, corals, and bivalves vertebrate remains (here described: MAC GIR-042375).

The objective of this follow-up article is to verify the preliminary results from Voss et al. (2019) by resolving other still outstanding issues. The latter refers especially to the taxonomic assignment on the species level. For the time being, the Girona sea cow is tentatively assigned to P. ausetanum considering the palaeobiogeographic and stratigraphic background. If this can be confirmed, this specimen would complement the available information of the holotype, and hitherto only known specimen, of P. ausetanum described by Balaguer and Alba (2016). Based on CT-data and subsequent 3D-reconstruction of the preserved sea cow remains, the identification of additional diagnostic features referring to the snout region, the dentition, and the basicranium is uncovered. As a consequence, this allows a more accurate morphological and taxonomic interpretation of the Girona specimen. In light of the wider picture, this study will help to better understand the evolutionary history and diversity especially of Eocene sirenians.

Material and methods

For this subsequent and complementing article on fossil remains of a sea cow found in two slabs in the pedestrian zone in the city of Girona, CT-scans made at the Clínica Girona were analyzed in detail as best as possible. The CT used here was a GE light speed Optima CT520 (General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles/UK) and was utilized under the following protocol parameters: slice thickness 0.625 mm; space 0.31 mm; pitch 0.56 mm; single collimation width 0.625 mm; pixel spacing 0.4 × 0.4; matrix 512 × 512; field of view 250 mm; convolution kernel: Boneplus; tube voltage and stabilizer 120 kVp, 140 mA. Post-processing of the scanned slabs, i.e., segmentation of the individual bones and the combination of the separate section planes in 3D, is hampered by inclusions of iron-rich minerals and by the characteristic thick and dense sirenian bones itself keeping the contrast between bone and surrounding limestone relatively low. Nevertheless, the individual bones could be segmented and combined in 3D allowing further morphological examination of the skull. Analysis and visualization of the CT-data were performed with VGStudio MAX 2.2.

The taxonomic-morphological comparisons of the Girona specimen MAC GIR-042375 are based almost solely on personal investigations of the taxa for comparison. This refers to P. veronense De Zigno, 1875 and P. intermedium Bizzotto, 1983 from the Bartonian and Priabonian of North Italy, respectively, stored at MGPD (MV). In each case, the holotype and associated specimens were investigated as is provided by Voss (2013: appendix 2). One of the results of Voss’ (2013) study is a phylogeny of Sirenia based on a revised character-taxon matrix. This implies that the character coding of all considered sirenian taxa, including P. veronense and P. intermedium, was verified and, if necessary due to personal observations, adjusted. Morphological characters that are relevant here and scored contrary to other studies (e.g., Domning 1994; Díaz-Berenguer et al. 2018, 2022) are also stressed in the comparative Description chapter. Moreover, the holotypes, and hitherto only known specimens, of P. montserratense and P. solei Pilleri et al., 1989 were personally examined at MGSB (MV, OH). The holotype MGSB 44892 of P. montserratense from Castellbell i el Vilar (Catalonia, Spain) is embedded in the surrounding sediment, but still reveals a number of cranial and postcranial elements that represent “probably a complete animal” (Pilleri et al. 1989: 37). Reference to selected material is provided in the chapters Description and Discussion when relevant for comparison. The holotype MGSB 48657 of P. solei from Tona (Catalonia, Spain) represents a partially preserved specimen. Thereof, the following elements were investigated: a skullcap including the frontal, parietal, supraoccipital, and the left zygomatic process of the squamosal (MGSB 48657-1), the left mandibular ramus with M1-3 (MGSB 48657-2), a premaxillary fragment (MGSB 48657-3), the partially preserved maxilla with molars (MGSB 48657-4), and the left humerus (MGSB 48657-8). Comparisons with Prototherium ausetanum are based on the morphological descriptions from Balaguer and Alba (2016).

Institutional abbreviations

MAC, Museu d’Arqueologia de Catalunya, Girona, Spain; MGPD, Museo di Geologia e Paleontologia, Padova, Italy; MGSB, Museu Geològic del Seminari de Barcelona, Spain; RGHP, Réserve géologique de haute Provence, Digne-les-Bains, France; ZMB, Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Zoological Collection, Germany

Systematic palaeontology

Class Mammalia Linnaeus, 1758

Afrotheria Stanhope et al., 1998

Tethytheria McKenna, 1975

Pan-Sirenia O’Leary et al., 2013

Genus Prototherium de Zigno, 1887

Prototherium cf. ausetanum Balaguer & Alba, 2016

Nomenclatural remark

The present systematic palaeontology considers the quite recently established clade Pan-Sirenia, O’Leary et al., 2013. Thereby, O’Leary et al. (2013: supplementary material, table 4) apply the total group concept (Jefferies 1979) and distinguish between Pan-Sirenia as representing the total clade of Sirenia Illiger, 1811, whereas Sirenia is redefined and restricted to the node-based crown group as the least inclusive clade containing all living sirenians, their last common ancestor, and all of its descendants. The same concept is introduced later again by Vélez-Juarbe and Wood (2018). Therefore, priority, and hence reference for Pan-Sirenia, is given here to O’Leary et al. (2013).

Material

MAC GIR-042375, partial skull and rib remains documented in urban paving stones of Girona, Catalonia, Spain.

Locality

Limestone quarry south of Sant Vicenç de Castellet, central Catalonia, Spain.

Stratigraphic position

Late Bartonian, middle Eocene. The age of the find is corrected from early Bartonian (Voss et al. 2019) to late Bartonian (Galindo et al. 2003).

Description

The sirenian remains are embedded in a shallow carbonate platform sediment consisting of an alternation of biomicritic limestones, lutites and bluish-grey claystones (Figs 1, 2), and are distributed on two slabs, each measuring 2 cm in thickness. The preserved elements mainly belong to the skull of a single specimen and include parts of the rostrum (premaxilla and maxilla), frontal, vomer, basicranium, and fragments of the zygomatic arch (jugal and squamosal). From the teeth, the upper molars M1-M3 including crowns and roots are preserved. Otherwise, the dentition is indicated by the presence of alveoli. In addition to the macroscopic analysis, CT-scanning and post-processing allow more detailed morphological examination of the preserved skull parts. As already performed in Voss et al. (2019), the slab preserving a relative upper region of the skull roof and snout is designated as slab 1, the other representing a relatively deeper level within the skull is designated as slab 2 (Fig. 3).

Figure 2. 

Modified extract from the geological map (Mapa geològic de Catalunya 1:25 000, Monistrol de Montserrat 392-1-1 (71-29)) showing the position of the limestone quarry (circle: SE Sant Vicenç de Castellet, E of Llobregat river) from which the pavement slabs containing the MAC GIR-042375 Prototherium cf. ausetanum remains came from. All sediments from this area are dated to the late Bartonian.

Figure 3. 

Spatial orientation of the fossil-bearing slabs in A. Lateral view; B. Frontal view. CT-scans of the upper slab 1 and the lower slab 2 (both in color) are aligned in an anatomically correct position using the extant dugong as reference (grey-scaled CT-scan of Dugong dugon ZMB_MAM 69306).

The first new observation refers to the orientation of the single fossil-bearing slabs. With the help of an adult skull of the extant dugong (Dugong dugon, ZMB_MAM 69306), the partial skull was aligned in an anatomically correct position mainly considering the slope of both, the jugal and the rostrum. As a result, each slab shows oblique angles in the transversal plane, hence do not lie one-to-one at that specific level. For slab 1, the angles are 28.22° in lateral view, and 4.3° in frontal view; for slab 2, the angles are 28.22° in lateral view, and 6.0° in frontal view, respectively (Fig. 3a, b). This explains, amongst others, why each slab preserves skull elements from a vertically higher level on the right side and from a somewhat lower level on the left side. The same applies to the antero-posterior orientation of the slabs, which accordingly show skull elements from a lower level anteriorly and cranial parts from a higher level posteriorly. As it will be outlined below, the oblique orientation sometimes impedes the correlation of specific structures between the slabs, which resulted in amendments as to some observations made in Voss et al. (2019).

The distance between both slabs could be ascertained to be 11.4 mm (Fig. 3). As such, a total of 50 mm, i.e., 40 mm fossil-bearing stone plus circa 10 mm non-preserved interspace, is the basis for this study. This equals about 50% to 77% of the height of a typical Eocene-Oligocene sirenian skull (Voss 2013: appendix 3, Measurements of crania: top of supraoccipital to ventral sides of occipital condyles (de)).

Furthermore, the preliminary results by Voss et al. (2019) on the individual age and the taxonomic assignment of the Girona find can be verified.

Voss et al. (2019) determine the Girona specimen as representing at least a young adult based on the advanced state of wear of the M3 and its position at the level of the posterior margin of the zygomatic orbital bridge (Mitchell 1973). At this point, an amendment to the preceding description in Voss et al. (2019) is necessary. While the position of the M3 is confirmed in macroscopic view and in the CT-scans (Voss et al. 2019: fig. 6b, c), the position of M1-2 as shown in slab 1 (Voss et al. 2019: fig. 6a) has to be adjusted. The two visible alveoli in the latter figure belong most certainly to P4-P3 considering the higher anatomical level of slab 1 combined with the transversally non-planar cut of the slabs (Fig. 4a).

Figure 4. 

Prototherium cf. ausetanum, MAC GIR-042375. A. Photograph; B. Corresponding CT-scan of slab 1 with focus on the basicranium. The unpolished bottom side of slab 1 (A) shows parts of the basisphenoid, the spheno-occipital eminences, and the basioccipital, all of which being firmly fused indicating adulthood. The CT-Scan of the basicranium (B) shows interferences, however, the suture between basisphenoid and basioccipital is unequivocally obliterated and estimated to be more or less level with the vertical interference (indicated by arrows). Abbreviations: BO, basioccipital; BS, basisphenoid; J, jugal; M, maxilla; PF, pharyngeal fossa; PM, premaxilla; P3-4, third and fourth upper permanent premolars; SOE, spheno-occipital eminences; ZOB, zygomatic-orbital bridge of maxilla.

For relative age determination, it is also highly indicative whether sutures between certain bones are open, fused or even obliterated (Pocock 1940; Mitchell 1973). The contact between the basisphenoid and basioccipital is especially important for the identification of adulthood. Elements of the basicranium are clearly and best visible on the unpolished bottom side of slab 1 (Fig. 4a) showing parts of the basisphenoid, the spheno-occipital eminences, and the basioccipital that is mainly preserved with its left extension. The anterior ends of the spheno-occipital eminences mark the approximate contact between basisphenoid and basioccipital. Both bones are considered as being firmly fused, since there is no indication of a suture. This is also confirmed in the respective CT-Scan (Fig. 4b) despite interferences that reduce the scan quality. Consequently, the Girona specimen definitively belongs to an adult individual.

With respect to the taxonomic assignment, Voss et al. (2019) identified the Girona sea cow as a representative of the Eocene genus Prototherium (and finally P. ausetanum) based on the antemolar dental formula. This is corroborated also in this study and observable in slab 2 (Fig. 5). Thereby, Fig. 4a reflects mainly alveoli in macroscopic dorsal view of slab 2 and Fig. 4b shows the corresponding CT-scan with teeth in ventral view of slab 2. As a result, four alveoli for single-rooted premolars (P1-4) can be unambiguously ascertained (Fig. 5a). The complete number of premolars reflects plesiomorphic conditions and is characteristic for Eocene sirenians (e.g., Voss 2013). The most important feature is the absence of a persistent DP5, a molariform upper deciduous fifth premolar, which is a peculiarity in the dental formula of Prototherium (e.g., Domning 1994; Bizzotto 2005; Balaguer and Alba 2016). While also the lack of DP5 can be deduced directly from the preserved maxillary parts on the slabs, the presence and absence of alveoli is hardly observable in the corresponding CT-Scan even after careful post-processing and evaluation of the ventral side of the slab (Fig. 5b). This is primarily based on the fact that the contrast between sirenian bone and surrounding matrix is relatively low. Additionally, inclusions of iron-rich minerals cause harmful interferences.

Figure 5. 

Prototherium cf. ausetanum, MAC GIR-042375. A. Photograph showing the dorsal side of slab 2; B. Corresponding CT-scan showing the ventral side of slab 2 focusing on the dentition; C. CT-scans of anatomically correct combined slab 1 and 2 in lateral view. The CT-scan of the lower side of slab 2 (B) reveals the crowns of the upper molars 1–3 (M1-3) with the M3 fully erupted and clearly in wear. Abbreviations: BS, basisphenoid; C, upper canine; FI, foramen incisivum; I1, first upper incisor; J, jugal; M, maxilla; M1-3, first to third upper molars; P1-4, first to fourth permanent upper premolars; PM, premaxilla; ZOB, zygomatic-orbital bridge of maxilla.

Figure 6. 

Prototherium cf. ausetanum, MAC GIR-042375. A. Photograph; B. Corresponding CT-scan of slab 1 providing data on the overall morphology of the specimen. Abbreviations: BC, basicranium; F, frontal; M, maxilla; PM, premaxilla; V, vomer.

Nevertheless, the present results support the Girona specimen as belonging to the genus Prototherium. As such, its identification on the species level focusses on comparisons with three Prototherium species generally considered valid: P. veronense De Zigno, 1875 from the late middle Eocene (Bartonian) of Verona (Italy), P. intermedium Bizzotto, 1983 from the late Eocene (Priabonian) of Possagno (north-east from Verona, Italy), and the recently established P. ausetanum Balaguer & Alba, 2016 from the Bartonian of Tona (Catalonia, Spain). Additionally, the taxonomic-morphological comparisons are complemented by two further Prototherium species from the Bartonian of Catalonia, P. solei Pilleri et al., 1989 and P. montserratense Pilleri et al., 1989. As it will be discussed later, their status and affinities are uncertain (e.g., Domning 1996; Bizzotto 2005; Balaguer and Alba 2016). However, the geographic and stratigraphic occurrence of both species raise particular relevance for the comparison with specimen MAC GIR-042375 from Girona.

The subsequent new results on the morphology and taxonomy of the Girona specimen include additional data on the premaxilla, the maxilla (zygomatic-orbital bridge), the basicranium, and the dentition. All comparative descriptions rely on the preserved features only.

For the premaxilla, plesiomorphic conditions of the dental formula have been assumed by Voss et al. (2019). However, analyses of the CT-scans do not allow drawing further conclusions on this. While one pair of upper incisor tusks (I1) is clearly indicated by distinct alveoli and verified by both, macroscopic and CT-data (Fig. 5a, b), further alveoli, i.e., for a second and third upper incisor (I2-3), cannot be ascertained from the CT-scans. Although the premaxillary dental formula is known to be complete in P. veronense and P. intermedium and hence would not provide a distinctive feature on species level here, the morphological information of the Girona specimen remains limited in this regard. As such, the available data of the holotype of P. ausetanum cannot be complemented assuming that the Girona sea cow is a representative of that species. The same applies to P. solei and P. montserratense. While P. solei shows an incomplete premaxilla that does not reveal informative characters relevant here, the premaxilla of P. montserratense is temporarily not accessible, because the holotype specimen is still embedded in sediment.

Further preserved diagnostic features of the premaxilla refer to the length of the alveolus for the first upper incisor (I1). Slab 2 reveals the alveoli of both I1 (Fig. 5a, b). While the alveolus on the right side is distorted by inclusions, the one on the left side is already shown to be tapered dorsally indicating the uppermost part of the alveolus (Fig. 5c). Slab 2 represents the lower 2 cm of the preserved partial skull with the left side reflecting a more ventral level than the right side. Hence, it is plausible to conclude that the left I1 alveolus definitively did not exceed half the length of the premaxillary symphysis considering slab 1 and the interspace between slab 1 and 2, both commencing at least 3 cm (Fig. 5c). Moreover, it is likely that the I1 alveolus extends even less than half the length of the symphysis similar to P. veronense and P. intermedium (re-scored by Voss 2013: character 157), even though it is not exactly clear how much of the dorsalmost and ventralmost parts of the premaxilla are missing in MAC GIR-042375.

Another morphological feature with diagnostic value is related to the position of the zygomatic-orbital bridge of the maxilla with respect to the palate (e.g., Domning 1994: character 11; Voss 2013: character 21; Springer et al. 2015). According to Balaguer and Alba (2016), it is more or less level with the alveolar plane in P. ausetanum (about 6 mm above the tooth arcade). This is also the case with the Girona specimen as can be inferred from the CT-Scan shown in Fig. 4c. In fact, the zygomatic-orbital bridge in MAC GIR-042375 is even on the same level with the tooth arcade. While this condition is also observable in P. solei, this is a strong contrast compared to P. veronense and, according to personal observations also to P. intermedium, where the zygomatic-orbital bridge is elevated above the palate, with its ventral surface lying more than 15 mm above the alveolar margin (Voss 2013). In P. montserratense, the zygomatic-orbital bridge is not accessible.

The morphology of the basicranium may have very likely diagnostic value. As stated above, the basisphenoidal-basioccipital region is preserved, which is best visible in macroscopic view of slab 1 (Fig. 4a). Amongst sirenians, the shape of the spheno-occipital eminences varies in either being concave or convex, and therefore, may provide differences at species level (Voss 2013). While these are convex in P. veronense and P. montserratense, they are concave in P. intermedium. This is a similarity with the Girona sea cow MAC GIR-042375. The postulated concavities at this level in macroscopic view are supported by the respective CT-scan (Fig. 4b). In P. ausetanum, this character cannot be assessed, because the respective area is incomplete, covered by sediment and deformed insofar that bony material from the right side overlay the posteroventral region of the skull (Jordi Balaguer 2023, pers. comm.). In P. solei, the basicranium is not preserved.

At this point also a correction as to the presence of a hypoglossal foramen is made (Voss et al. 2019: fig. 6a). CT-scanning and post-processing do not confirm a hypoglossal foramen on the left side of the basioccipital. Instead, the visible “foramen” in Fig. 4 is either the result of an inclusion or it could be a ventral excavation in the basioccipital, a pharyngeal fossa (PF). However, a hypoglossal foramen, if present in that species, would be positioned more caudad within the basioccipital.

Moreover, our examination of the preserved M1-3 crowns in deeper levels of slab 2 further helps to substantiate the taxonomic identity of the Girona specimen (Fig. 5a). Compared with the species of Prototherium, it shows differences in the mesiodistal length of the molars (Table 1). The M1 in MAC GIR-042375 is generally smaller than in the three Prototherium taxa hitherto considered valid with a deviation of about 16% and 21% in P. veronense and P. intermedium, respectively, but only 2% in P. ausetanum if the M1 from the left side is compared. The M2 is also distinctly smaller than in P. veronense and P. intermedium having a difference of 18% and 9.5%, respectively, but it is about 5% larger than in P. ausetanum. With the exception of P. intermedium, which lacks respective information (presumably, because both M3 in the holotype are not fully measurable according to personal observations), the mesiodistal length of the M3 in the Girona sea cow is 11% and 5% smaller than in P. veronense and P. ausetanum, respectively.

Table 1.

Mesiodistal length of molars M1-3 of the “Girona specimen” MAC GIR-042375 compared to other Prototherium species: data for P. veronense and P. intermedium are taken from Pilleri et al. (1989: table VII), and data for P. ausetanum are from Balaguer and Alba (2016: table 2). Measurements for P. solei and P. montserratense were taken personally and are similar or correspond, respectively, to Pilleri et al. (1989: table on page 19 and table XIII). l and r correspond to measurements from the left and right side, respectively.

mesiodistal length in mm
M1 M2 M3
P. veronense (cast of holotype) 16 21 23
P. intermedium (holotype) 17 19 /
P. ausetanum (holotype) 13.8 l / 15.5 r 16.3 l / 16.6 r 21.6 l / 21.4 r
Girona specimen (MAC GIR-042375) 13.5 17.2 20.5
P. montserratense (holotype) / 17 21
P. solei (holotype) / 15 18

Extending the comparisons upon the preserved M2-3 in P. solei and P. montserratense from Spain unveils interesting results. The M2-3 in MAC GIR-042375 (and in P. ausetanum) is about 13% and 12% larger than in P. solei, respectively, making the latter species the smallest in terms of the molar dimensions. However, compared with P. montserratense, the M2-3 are almost as large as in MAC GIR-042375 (Table 1). Taken together, these measurements point to a sirenian that is rather small compared with the Prototherium taxa from Italy, but that is very similar in size compared with P. ausetanum and P. montserratense from Spain.

Another molar feature to distinguish MAC GIR-042375 refers to the shape of the M2-3. Except for P. ausetanum, all taxa for comparison show a trapezoid M2, with the protoloph each wider than the metaloph, whereas in both, MAC GIR-042375 (Fig. 5b) and P. ausetanum (Balaguer and Alba 2016: fig. 4), the proportions of the lophs are similar resulting in a rather rectangular outline of the M2. Similarly, the M3 is trapezoid in all Prototherium species from Italy and Spain, but not in MAC GIR-042375 (Fig. 5b) and P. ausetanum (Balaguer and Alba 2016: fig. 4) where the M3 is rather oval and tapering distad.

In the following, the description of specimen MAC GIR-042375 is complemented with regard to the preserved morphology visible in slab 1 (Fig. 6) in order to provide overall insights to the reader.

The CT-scan of the slab represents a relatively deep level of the upper part of the skull (Fig. 6b).

After post-processing, the nasal area could be made well visible by reconstructing the extension of the vomer. The vomer is a mediolaterally thin element and triangular in cross section as in other sirenians. It passes through most of the internal narial passage, contacts the maxilla laterally (and most likely the palatine, that, however, cannot be distinguished here) and extends in a longitudinal groove on the dorsal surface of the maxilla slightly forward into the mesorostral fossa (external nasal opening). Anteriorly, the vomer builds up the nasal septum. Posteriorly, the vomer runs indistinctly out into the basicranium.

On the left side, parts of the frontal are visible with the slightly downturned supraorbital process. A complex of remnants of the left jugal anteriorly and the left zygomatic process posteriorly indicate the zygomatic arch of the squamosal.

Discussion

The analysis of the CT-Scans resulted in a genuine added value in terms of supplemented morphological data that allow for a more coherent taxonomic assignment of the Girona sea cow.

First of all, this specimen is undoubtedly considered as representing a Prototherium species. As mentioned above, the key characteristic for the genus Prototherium is the lack of a persistent DP5/ DP5 (e.g., Domning 1994; Bizzotto 2005; Balaguer and Alba 2016) that is also supported in this study.

Taking into account observations in more derived sea cows, i.e. members of the Dugonginae that show mesial drift of their molars and, as a consequence, lose preceding teeth in lifetime, one can argue that there may have been an unreplaced DP5 that was worn out and shed given the advanced age of the Girona specimen. The gap between P4 and M1 would then have been closed by mesial drift. Although this is an interesting perspective, it is likewise a difficult one. For example, there are two specimens known from Eocene strata representing adults of “Halitheriumtaulannense that show irregular resorption of DP5/DP5 (holotype skull RGHP D040 and paratype mandible RGHP E.7.096a (Voss 2013)). The respective specimens reveal traces of resorption in so far that the area between P4/P4 and M1/M1 is roughened and spongy, but still retracing the former alveoli. Mesial drift however is not indicated in those specimens.

Traces of resorption are commonly present in specimens that are known to have lost teeth due to mesial drift, especially amongst members of the subfamily Dugonginae that are characterized by the reduction of the antemolar dentition (e.g., Domning 1989). According to Luckett (1993), resorption can take place in different degrees. For example, this is observable in the maxilla of Dioplotherium manigaulti Cope, 1883 in which the antemolar area is characterised by bone-filled, degenerated alveoli indicating the former presence of deciduous premolars; the only distinct socket remaining in this roughened area is for the lingual root of the originally three-rooted DP5 (Domning 1989). Exactly such traces of resorption are missing in the Girona specimen. Instead, the area between P4 and M1 appears to be unsuspicious as are the roots of the preserved molars that do not indicate mesial drift (Fig. 5a, b). Consequently, the lack of a persistent DP5/DP5 as a generic distinguishing feature for Prototherium is not questioned here.

Although the data basis remains limited not at least due to the lack of material between and in each of the two fossil-bearing slabs, the present study provides a combination of characters that argues with the utmost probability for the Girona specimen as being a representative of P. ausetanum. Two characters corroborate that hypothesis on the species level and refer to the shape of the M2 and M3. As outlined above, only MAC GIR-042375 and P. ausetanum share a rectangular M2 as well as an oval M3. Three further characters that do not argue unambiguously for a taxonomic assignment to P. ausetanum, but can be put into perspective, refer to the mesiodistal length of the molar crowns, the position of the zygomatic-orbital bridge, and the shape of the spheno-occipital eminences. Of all taxa for comparison, the mesiodistal length especially of M2-3 is most similar between MAC GIR-042375, P. ausetanum, and P. montserratense. A zygomatic-orbital bridge nearly level with the alveolar margin is congruent only in MAC GIR-042375, P. ausetanum, and P. solei. While P. montserratense differs from MAC GIR-042375 in having convex spheno-occipital eminences (a morphological feature that is also present in P. veronense), personal observations of the holotype specimen also reveal that it is not fully grown. This is indicated by the non-obliterated spheno-occipital suture and the only slightly worn M3. As such, the subadult age may qualify the current results on the mesiodistal length of M2-3 in P. montserratense. The material basis of P. solei does not provide further morphological characters that can be compared here. However, three differing dental characters as mentioned above versus one shared cranial character, i.e. the level of the zygomatic-orbital bridge, question a taxonomic assignment of MAC GIR-042375 to P. solei. Against that background, the feature of concave spheno-occipital eminences in the Girona specimen may potentially supplement the morphological information of the holotype of P. ausetanum, which lacks respective data. In fact, these eminences are likewise concave in P. intermedium, but the latter differs from MAC GIR-042375 in the dental features outlined above and in that the zygomatic-orbital bridge is clearly elevated above the alveolar margin. As such, the fossil sea cow remains from Girona resp. Sant Vicenç de Castellet contribute to more and new information that enhance and supplement our knowledge on the morphology and, considering the similar age and area, distribution of P. ausetanum.

In addition to the morphology, the stratigraphy and palaeogeography implicate, at least in part, new hypotheses on the taxonomic identity of the species for comparison, which, conversely, support the assignment of MAC GIR-042375 to P. ausetanum. In the Bartonian, potentially four Prototherium taxa are present in southern Europe: P. ausetanum (including MAC GIR-042375), P. montserratense and P. solei, each from Spain, and P. veronense from Italy. For the latter species, different and sometimes contradictory information on its geological age exist throughout the literature, and therefore, this issue shall be clarified first. Apart from Bizzotto (1983: 106) and Balgauer and Alba (2016), for example, who provided a Bartonian age for P. veronense, it is also indicated as coming from late Eocene (Priabonian) strata (Domning 1994, 1996; Zalmout and Gingerich 2012: table 1). Meanwhile, the age of the find locality of P. veronense, Monte Duello in the Italian Province of Verona, is considered to pertain to the middle Eocene, i.e. Bartonian (Zorzin et al. 2012; Zorzin and Frisone 2013), making this taxon synchronous with the sirenians from Spain. The only Prototherium species coming from stratigraphically younger sediments, i.e. Priabonian, is P. intermedium from Italy (Bizzotto 1983; Domning 1996). Interestingly, the stratigraphically older and palaeo­geographically more distant species, P. montserratense and P. solei (Pilleri et al. 1989), are considered synonymous with P. intermedium, either both (Domning 1996) or only P. solei (Sagne 2001; Balgauer and Alba 2016). New hypotheses about the validity of the synonymously treated species are discussed as follows.

As outlined above, the present study provides morphological information from the not yet fully prepared holotype of P. montserratense that is even now valuable for comparison. For the time being, the morphological characters of it presented here argue for a species distinct from P. intermedium, hence, neither supporting a synonymy (Domning 1996: 388) nor the status of a subspecies (Bizzotto 2005) with the latter taxon. While Sagne (2001) already refuted the synonymy of P. montserratense with P. intermedium on a morphological basis, the distinction of both is also reinforced by their stratigraphic and palaeogeographic data. Moreover, P. montserratense is not considered a nomen dubium (Balguer and Alba 2016) though this treatment is well noted as being only provisional pending further investigations. Instead, similarities with P. veronense (and differences with P. intermedium) like convex spheno-occipital eminences, may argue for the hypothesis that P. montserratense is a subadult representative of the former, hence potentially synonymous with P. veronense. Such synonymy that was also pondered by Balaguer and Alba (2016) would be additionally in accordance with the stratigraphic occurrence of both and the consideration of sirenians as migrating species. This hypothesis finds support through a number of other morphological features that are, however, not present in the object of this study. Taking into account that a taxonomic revision of the genus Prototherium is not the scope of the present study, this shall nevertheless be shortly outlined here. For example, P. veronense and P. montserratense show a ventral border of the horizontal mandibular ramus that is tangent to the angle as well as a posterior border of the mandible that has a distinct steplike process below the condyle, both character states contrasting with P. intermedium (Voss 2013: appendix 4). Therefore, it shall be emphasized here that it is highly relevant to examine the holotype specimen of P. montserratense completely in order to clarify its status, either as a distinct, and hence valid species, or a synonym of P. veronense.

Similarly, P. solei is questioned here to be either a junior synonym (Domning 1996; Sagne 2001; Balaguer and Alba 2016) or a subspecies (Bizzotto 2005) of P. intermedium. On the one hand, the stratigraphic and palaeogeographic data provide arguments for a distinction of both species. On the other hand, morphological differences like the position of the zygomatic orbital bridge argue against an assignment of P. solei to P. intermedium. Considering again characters beyond those preserved in the object of this study, the mandibular morphology in P. solei reveals an interesting combination of characters. The course of the ventral border of the horizontal ramus that is most likely tangent with the angle resembles that in P. montserratense and P. veronense, whereas the posterior border of the mandible seems to lack a distinct process below the condyle similar to P. intermedium. In summary, P. solei demonstrates similarities and, at the same time, differences with all taxa for comparison, including P. ausetanum (and MAC GIR-042375). These incongruences illustrate that P. solei needs to be carefully reinvestigated in consideration of the other Prototherium species aiming at a thorough revision of the genus in total. As such, and for the time being, P. solei is provisionally treated as a distinct species according to Pilleri et al (1989).

Further studies could also help to fix the issue of the controversially discussed interrelationships of the genus Prototherium, which is shown as para- and polyphyletic in Balaguer and Alba (2016) as well as in the first (Domning 1994) and the most recent (Díaz-Berenguer et al. 2022; Heritage and Seiffert 2022) cladistic analyses of sirenians. In Vélez-Juarbe and Wood (2018), the interrelationships of Eocene sirenians, including Prototherium, are not resolved at all, showing a large polytomy. Domning (1996: 388) already assumed that P. intermedium is probably generically distinct from P. veronense, a hypothesis that has not further developed until to date. Therefore, this issue should be rather addressed after a thorough taxonomic-morphological revision of the genus, including the clarification of the status and affinities of P. solei and P. montserratense as outlined above.

This approach is particularly suggested in light of an alternative phylogenetic hypothesis that supports the monophyly of Prototherium by showing a sister group relationship between P. veronense and P. intermedium (Voss 2013). This sister grouping is confirmed by a unique combination of homoplasies and a good agreement between the phylogeny and stratigraphy (Voss 2013: fig. 75). Except character 21 referring to the level of the zygomatic-orbital bridge (Voss 2013), none of the features supporting the sister grouping are preserved in MAC GIR-042375. Therefore, Voss’ (2013) data set and cladistic analysis shall be updated and tested for stability first before further conclusions on the phylogenetic interrelationships are drawn.

Considering the bigger picture, better-resolved intra- and intergeneric relationships based on new informative fossils such as MAC GIR-042375 have the potential to contribute to a better understanding of the interrelationships of Eocene taxa and sirenians in total. Although this task is beyond the scope of this paper, it shall be outlined here that the classification of Sirenia has long been controversial. In other words: the traditional classification concept of Sirenia, which distinguishes four families (e.g., Domning 1996), is incongruent with the results of phylogenetic analyses of the order. This refers especially to the Dugongidae, the family that P. ausetanum is traditionally referred to according to Balaguer and Alba (2016). While only two dugongid groups are consistently revealed as monophyletic, the derived Dugonginae and Hydrodamalinae, Eocene dugongids are conspicuously paraphyletic as well as most of the genera (e.g., Domning 1994; Springer et al. 2015). Additionally, some approaches (e.g. Vélez-Juarbe et al. 2012; Springer et al. 2015) reveal Dugongidae as a clade, whereas other studies, including one of the latest (Domning 1994; Voss 2013; Díaz-Berenguer et al. 2018), do not affirm this hypothesis. Consequently, Eocene sirenians, and Eocene dugongids from the traditional point of view, represent one of the most controversially discussed taxa.

In order to solve this drastic paraphyly problem, Voss (2013) proposed the total group concept (Jefferies 1979) and distinguishes a stem group, which, by definition, is consistently paraphyletic, and a monophyletic crown group within the clade Sirenia, hence setting aside the traditional classification concept of four sirenian families. In the same year, and as already outlined in the Systematic palaeontology chapter, O’Leary et al. (2013) introduced Pan-Sirenia as the most inclusive group comprising all species more closely related to crown-Sirenia than to any other living species. This finds also consideration in the very latest and total evidence phylogenetic analysis by Heritage and Seiffert (2022). As such, Eocene dugongids in the traditional sense (compare previous studies cited above) fall into the stem group of Pan-Sirenia. Most of the more derived dugongids are part of crown-Sirenia and form the more exclusive, but monophyletic Dugongidae as defined by Heritage and Seiffert (2022). In terms of P. ausetanum, this species has to be considered now as a stem-group representative, i.e., a pan-sirenian that falls outside crown-Sirenia.

Palaeobiogeographic overview

Fig. 7 shows a comprehensive selection of Eocene pan-sirenian findings from Central and South Europe, and North Africa, providing an overview on the distribution of that group in this region and time frame.

Figure 7. 

Palaeogeographic map of Europe during the Eocene based on templates of Ron Blakey (2020) showing relevant sirenian findings. 1, Pan-Sirenia indet., Ypresian-Lutetian of Jebel Chambi, Tunisia (Benoit et al. 2013); 2, ?Dugongidae indet. (according to the traditional classification concept – but most likely Pan-Sirenia indet.), Lutetian of Navarre, Western Pyrenees, Spain (Astibia et al. 2010); 3, Sobrarbesiren cardieli, middle Lutetian of Castejón de Sobrarbe, Huesca, Spain (Díaz-Berenguer et al. 2018); 4, Prototherium ausetanum, Bartonian of Tona, Catalonia, Spain (Balaguer and Alba 2016); 5, Prototherium cf. ausetanum, late Bartonian of Sant Vicenç de Castellet, Catalonia, Spain (this paper); 6, Eotheroides sp., late Lutetian-Priabonian of Taulanne, Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France (Domning et al. 1982); 7, “Halitheriumtaulannense, Priabonian of Catellane, Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France (Sagne 2001); 8, Prototherium veronense, Bartonian of Monte Duello, N Italy (De Zigno, 1875); 9, Prototherium intermedium, Priabonian of Possagno, N Italy (Bizzotto 1983); 10, Sirenavus hungaricus, Lutetian of Felsőgalla, Hungary (Kretzoi 1941); 11, Anisosiren pannonica, Lutetian of Oroszlány, Hungary (Kordos 1979); 12, Paralitherium tarkanyense, Priabonian of Felsőtarkány, Hungary (Kordos 1977); 13, Sirenia indet. (most likely Pan-Sirenia, see Discussion), Priabonian of Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fuchs 1970).

There is a rough SW-NE direction or tendency of distribution regarding the geological ages of the records. In the southwestern Tethyan area, ear bones from the early Eocene (Ypresian) of Tunisia represent the oldest sea cow remains (Benoit et al. 2013). Although the taxonomic identity of these periotics remains unclear, the morphology of these is even more primitive compared to those from the hitherto earliest known prorastomids (Prorastomus and Pezosiren), and pan-sirenians at all, from Jamaica (Benoit et al. 2013). There are also stratigraphically old pan-sirenians known from the early middle Eocene (Lutetian) of the Pyrenean Basin with taxonomically not further defined postcrania from Navarre (late Lutetian of Spain; Astibia et al. 2010) as well as the recently established and even older species Sobrarbesiren cardieli from Huesca (middle Lutetian of northeastern Spain; Díaz-Berenguer et al. 2018). The latter is especially interesting since it represents the first adequately known quadrupedal sea cow from Eurasia, including several skulls and diverse postcranial elements (Díaz-Berenguer et al. 2020). In the deepest embayment of the Pyrenean Basin, P. ausetanum is documented from younger middle Eocene sediments, i.e., Bartonian. This refers to the likely representative from Girona described by Voss et al. (2019) and reviewed herein, and the holotype specimen from Tona (Balaguer and Alba 2016). These records are followed up northeastwards by on trend younger fossils such as several skulls, mandibles and postcranial material of Eotheroides sp. (late Lutetian to Priabonian) and “Halitheriumtaulannense (Priabonian), both from Taulanne (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France; Domning et al. 1982; Sagne 2001), and the Bartonian P. veronense (de Zigno 1875) and the Priabonian P. intermedium (Bizzotto 1983), both from within the Helvetian trough of North Italy. The known pan-sirenian fossils from the Eocene of Hungary still show a stratigraphic range. While the partial skull and mandibular fragment of Sirenavus hungaricus (Kretzoi 1941) as well as the maxilla of Anisosiren pannonica (Kordos 1979) are recorded from the Lutetian, the mandibles of Paralitherium tarkanyense (Kordos 1977) are Priabonian in age. Apart from that, a single cranial roof documents a Priabonian occurrence in the northeast-most European Tethyan realm of the Carpathian Basin and is determined as Sirenia indet. from Romania (Fuchs 1970).

In light of this stratigraphic and taxonomic background, the hypothesis on a Tethyan origin of sea cows is reinforced. Pan-Sirenia form a well-substantiated clade called Tethytheria together with their extant sister group Proboscidea (McKenna 1975; McKenna and Bell 1997). While the origin of the latter is well-recorded in Africa, the earliest pan-sirenians have long been only known from the Eocene of Jamaica (Savage et al. 1994; Domning 2001a, b). The periotics from the late Ypresian-early Lutetian (late early-early middle Eocene) of Tunisia do not only represent the oldest sea cow remains from Africa (Benoit et al. 2013), but can be now also considered to predate Prorastomus sirenoides from Jamaica according to Heritage and Seiffert (2022). Additionally, the morphology of the ear bones reflects more plesiomorphic conditions than those of P. sirenoides (Benoit et al. 2013), which is also shown by Heritage and Seiffert (2022), who phylogenetically identify the Tunisian find as the basal-most pan-sirenian. Thus, the morphological, stratigraphic and biogeographic evidence corroborates a North African origin of Pan-Sirenia that, in turn, contributes to a better understanding of the Tethytheria hypothesis (e.g., Tassy and Shoshani 1988; Murphy et al. 2001).

Although a fast dispersal remains a solid hypothesis in the evolutionary history of stem pan-sirenians (e.g., Domning 1994), this no longer includes the Jamaican prorastomids alone, but also a number of European fossils and taxa from the early middle Eocene (Lutetian) as mentioned above. Especially the Pyrenean Basin appears to be a kind of hot spot that yielded a number of stem sea cows limited to the middle Eocene. On the one hand, Sobrarbesiren cardieli is the hitherto oldest record of western Europe and the only quadrupedal form of Eurasia (Díaz-Berenguer et al. 2018), hence providing one of the rare examples for dispersal amongst early pan-sirenians that probably had an already fully aquatic lifestyle (Díaz-Berenguer et al. 2020: 672). On the other hand, the Bartonian P. ausetanum including the Girona specimen (Balaguer and Alba 2016; Voss et al. 2019) indicates further diversification in this area. With emphasis on the North African – Eurasian Tethyan realm considered here (Fig. 7), the southwestern Tethys is hypothesized as the evolutionary center for Eocene Pan-Sirenia, from where they dispersed westwards through the Atlantic (Benoit et al. 2013; Heritage and Seiffert 2022) as well as northwards through the Tethyan Ocean.

Conclusions

The present study incorporates the non-invasive analysis of CT-scans and macroscopic data generated from a sirenian find embedded in two paving slabs. On the basis of these data, and supplementing the results from Voss et al. (2019), the Girona sea cow MAC GIR-042375 belongs to the genus Prototherium and most likely represents P. ausetanum Balaguer & Alba, 2016 from the middle Eocene of Catalonia (Spain). Morphological results on the maxilla, the basicranium, and the dentition confirm and complement the available information of the holotype of that species. Against the background that MAC GIR-042375 is determined as adult, it is especially the mesiodistal length of the molar crowns that outline P. ausetanum as a small-sized species in general, hence distinct from other Prototherium taxa.

Considering the distribution of stem pan-sirenians across Eurasia in total, the records not only reflect a rough southwest-northeast oriented trend towards younger geological ages, but also mark the Pyrenean Basin as one of the centers of abundant and well-preserved pan-sirenians, including nearly complete skulls and skeletons even of a plesiomorphic evolutionary stage like Sobrarbesiren cardieli (Díaz-Berenguer et al. 2018).

Data availability

The paving stones containing the fossil sea cow remains are being exhibited in the Museu d’Arqueologia de Catalunya (Archaeology Museum) in Girona and have the collection number MAC GIR-042375.

All CT images of this sirenian are archived in the Museum für Naturkunde and accessible through the Department of Science Data Management under https://doi.org/10.7479/c65w-cj22 (Voss et al. 2022; Cranial CT-data of Eocene Prototherium ausetanum from Catalonia compared to a Dugong skull [Dataset], shared under a CreativeCommons CC-BY license).

Author contribution

MV and OH conceived the research, processed the morphological analyses and wrote the manuscript. JCV run the CT analyses at the Clínica Girona. KM finalised segmentation of the CT data and provided the 3D reconstruction. MV prepared Figs 3 to 6. OH produced Figs 1, 2 and 7. All authors edited the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply thankful to Roger Mata Lleonart (Caldes de Malavella, Spain), Jordi Ferrer Lopez and Marta Picó (both Girona, Spain) – without whose kind assistance, this work could not have been realised. We are indebted to the Mayor of the City of Girona, Maria Madrenas who warmly welcomed us and supported our research operation. We are grateful to Daryl P. Domning (Washington, D.C.) who provided valuable comments that were considered in the discussion on the dentition. Jan Philipp Kundt (Berlin, Germany) prepared initial CT segmentations, David M. Alba and Jordi Balaguer Bruguera (both Barcelona, Spain) kindly helped with the interpretation of the basicranium of the holotype of P. ausetanum. Finally, we deliver our thanks to the two reviewers, Iyad Zalmout (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) and one anonymous, who provided very constructive comments that significantly improved our article.

References

  • Astibia H, Bardet N, Pereda-Suberbiola X, Payros A, de Buffrénil V, Elorza J, Tosquella J, Berreteaga A, Badiola A (2010) New fossils of Sirenia from the middle Eocene of Navarre (Western Pyrenees): the oldest West European sea cow record. Geological Magazine 147(5): 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756810000130
  • Benoit J, Adnet S, Mabrouk EE, Khayati H, Haj Ali MB, Marivaux L, Merzeraud G, Merigeaud S, Vianey-Liaud M, Tabuce R (2013) Cranial remain from Tunisia provides new clues for the origin and evolution of Sirenia (Mammalia, Afrotheria) in Africa. PLoS ONE 8(1): e54307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054307
  • Bizzotto B (1983) Prototherium intermedium n. sp. (Sirenia) dell’Eocene Superiore di Possagno e proposta di revisione sistematica del taxon Eotheroides Palmer 1899. Memorie degli Istituti di Geologia e Mineralogia dell‘Universita di Padova 36: 95–116.
  • Bizzotto B (2005) La struttura cranica di Prototherium intermedium (Mammalia: Sirenia) dell’ Eocene superiore Veneto. Nuovi Contributi alla sua Anatomica e Sistematica. Lavori Societá Veneziana di Scienze Naturali 30: 107–125.
  • Cope ED (1883) On a new extinct genus of Sirenia from South Carolina. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 35: 52–54.
  • De Zigno A (1875) Sirenii fossili trovati nel Veneto. Memorie del Reale Instituto veneto di scienze, lettere ed arti 18: 427–456.
  • De Zigno A (1887) Quelques observations sur les siréniens fossiles. Bulletin de la Société Geologique de France 15: 728–732.
  • Díaz-Berenguer E, Badiola A, Moreno-Azanza M, Canudo JI (2018) First adequately-known quadrupedal sirenian from Eurasia (Eocene, Bay of Biscay, Huesca, northeastern Spain). Scientific Reports 8(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23355-w
  • Díaz-Berenguer E, Houssaye A, Badiola A, Canudo JI (2020) The hind limbs of Sobrarbesiren cardieli (Eocene, Northeastern Spain) and new insights into the locomotion capabilities of the quadrupedal sirenians. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 27(4): 649–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-019-09482-9
  • Díaz-Berenguer E, Moreno-Azanza M, Badiola A, Canudo JI (2022) Neurocranial bones are key to untangling the sea cow evolutionary tree: osteology of the skull of Sobrarbesiren cardieli (Mammalia: Pan-Sirenia). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 196(4): 1671–1703. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac021
  • Domning DP (1994) A phylogenetic analysis of the Sirenia. In: Berta A, Deméré TA (Eds) Contributions in marine mammal paleontology honoring Frank C. Whitmore Jr. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History 29: 177–189.
  • Domning DP (2001a) Evolution of the Sirenia and Desmostylia. In: Mazin JM, de Buffrénil V (Eds) Secondary adaptation of tetrapods to life in water. Proceedings of the international meeting Poitiers, 1996. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich, 151–168.
  • Fuchs H (1970) Schädelfragment einer Sirene aus dem Eozan von Cluj, SR Rumanien. Geologie 19(10): 1185–1191.
  • Galindo J, Florensa RM, Puig C, López Blance M, Piña Iglesias J, Picart J (2003) Monistrol de Montserrat 392-1-1 (71-29). Mapa geològic de Catalunya 1:25000, Barcelona, Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya.
  • Heritage S, Seiffert ER (2022) Total evidence time-scaled phylogenetic and biogeographic models for the evolution of sea cows (Sirenia, Afrotheria). PeerJ 10: e13886. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13886
  • Illiger JKW (1811) Prodomus systematis mammalium et avium: additis terminis zographicis utriusque classis eorumque versione Germanica. Salfeld, Berlin, 301 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.106965
  • Jefferies RPS (1979) The origin of the chordates – a methodological essay. In: House MR (Ed.) The origin of major invertebrate groups. Systematics Association Special Volume 12: 443–477.
  • Kretzoi M (1941) Sirenavus hungaricus n. g., n. sp. Ein neuer Prorastomide aus dem Mittleozän (Lutetium) von Felsőgalla in Ungarn. Annales historico-naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, Pars Mineralogica, Geologica et Palaeontologica 34: 146–156.
  • Kordos L (1977) Új felső-eocén sziréna (Paralitherium tarkanyense) n.g. n.sp. Felsőtárkánybál. A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet évi jelentése 1975: 349–367.
  • Kordos L (1979) Major finds of scattered fossils in the palaeovertebrate collection of the Hungarian Geological Institute. A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet évi jelentése 1977: 313–326.
  • Linnaeus C (1758) Systema naturae per Regna tria naturae, secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Tomus I. Editio Decima, Reformata. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542
  • Luckett WP (1993) An ontogenetic assessment of dental homologies in therian mammals. In: Szalay FS, Novacek MJ, McKenna MC (Eds) Mammal Phylogeny: Mesozoic Differentiation, Multituberculates, Monotremes, Early Therians, and Marsupials. Springer, New York, 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9249-1_13
  • McKenna MC, Bell SK (1997) Classification of mammals above the species level. Columbia University Press, New York, 640 pp.
  • Murphy WJ, Eizirik E, Johnson WE, Zhang YP, Ryder OA, O’Brien SJ (2001) Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409: 614–618. https://doi.org/10.1038/35054550
  • O’Leary MA, Bloch JI, Flynn JJ, Gaudin TJ, Giallombardo A, Giannini NP, Goldberg SL, Kraatz BP, Luo Z-X, Meng J, Ni X, Novacek MJ, Perini FA, Randall ZS, Rougier GW, Sargis EJ, Silcox MT, Simmons NB, Spaulding M, Velazco PM, Weksler M, Wible JR, Cirranello AL (2013) The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals. Science 339: 662–667. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1229237
  • Pilleri G, Biosca J, Via L (1989) The Tertiary Sirenia of Catalonia. Brain Anatomy Institute, Ostermundigen, Switzerland, 98 pp.
  • Sagne C (2001) Halitherium taulannense, nouveau sirénien (Sirenia, Mammalia) de l’Éocène supérieur provenant du domaine Nord-Téthysien (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France). Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de la Terre et des Planètes 333: 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1251-8050(01)01661-5
  • Savage RJG, Domning DP, Thewissen JGM (1994) Fossil Sirenia of the West Atlantic and Caribbean region. V. The most primitive known sirenian, Prorastomus sirenoides Owen, 1855. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 14(3): 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1994.10011569
  • Springer MS, Signore AV, Paijmans JLA, Vélez-Juarbe J, Domning DP, Bauer CE, He K, Crerar L, Campos PF, Murphy WJ, Meredith RW, Gatesy J, Willerslev E, MacPhee RDE, Hofreiter M, Campbell KL (2015) Interordinal gene capture, the phylogenetic position of Steller’s sea cow based on molecular and morphological data, and the macroevolutionary history of Sirenia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 91: 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.05.022
  • Stanhope MJ, Waddell VG, Madsen O, de Jong W, Hedges SB, Cleven GC, Kao D, Springer MS (1998) Molecular evidence for multiple origins of the Insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 9967–9972. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.17.9967
  • Tassy P, Shoshani J (1988) The Tethytheria: elephants and their relatives. In: Benton MJ (Ed.) The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods. Vol. 2 Mammals. Systematics Association Special Volume 35B, 283–315.
  • Vélez-Juarbe J, Domning DP, Pyenson ND (2012) Iterative evolution of sympatric seacow (Dugongidae, Sirenia) assemblages during the past ~ 26 million years. PLoS ONE 7(2): e31294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031294
  • Voss M (2013) Revision of the Halitherium-species complex (Mammalia, Sirenia) from the late Eocene to early Miocene of Central Europe and North America. PhD Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin.
  • Voss M, Hampe O, Mata Lleonart R, Ferrer Lopez J (2019) Fossil sea cow remains (Mammalia: Sirenia) on paving stones in the City of Girona (Catalonia, Spain). Geoheritage 11(4): 1981–1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00419-5
  • Zalmout IS, Gingerich PD (2012) Late Eocene sea cows (Mammalia, Sirenia) from Wadi al Hitan in the western desert of Fayum, Egypt. University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology 37: 1–158.
  • Zorzin R, Castellani S, Frisone V, Quaggiotto E (2012) Le campagne di scavo del Museo Paleontologico di Roncà in località Monte Duello (Comune di Montecchia di Crosara) e Valle della Chiesa (Comune di Roncà), nei Monti Lessini veronesi (Italia settentrionale): primi risultati. Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona (Geologia Paleontologia Preistoria) 36: 53–62.
  • Zorzin R, Frisone V (2013) Montecchia di Crosara, Monte Duello. Il giacimento ricco di spicole di spugna: indagini 2011–2013. Notizie di Archeologia del Veneto 2: 99–103.
login to comment