USNM 8345, an almost complete shell (Gilmore 1916, figs 34, 35, pl. 76; Sullivan et al. 2013, fig. 20.2a, b).

Locality 60, Willow Wash, 2 miles northwest of Ojo Alamo store, San Juan County, New Mexico (Gilmore 1916), USA; De-na-zin Member, Kirtland Formation, upper Campanian, Upper Cretaceous (Sullivan et al. 2013).

Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) Fruitland and Kirtland formations of New Mexico (Gilmore 1916, 1919; Wiman 1933; Lucas and Sullivan 2006; Sullivan et al. 2013; Dalman and Lucas 2016; Lichtig and Lucas 2017) and Kaiparowits Formation of Utah (Hutchison et al. 2013; Lively 2016) (see Discussion for justification).

Denazinemys nodosa can be identified as a representative of Baenodda by the contribution of vertebral V to the posterior margin of the shell, an omega-shaped femoral-anal sulcus, and a midline contact between both extragulars posterior to the gulars and a representative of Eubaeninae by the presence of a subdivided cervical, the presence of prepleurals, and a vertebral III that is longer than wide. Among eubaenines Denazinemys nodosa can be differentiated by the following combination of characters: presence of welt-like ornamentation on the carapace (also present in Boremys spp. and Scabremys ornata), absence of a posterodorsal extension of the quadratojugal that crests the cavum tympani (also absent in Baena arenosa and Chisternon undatum), the presence of epipterygoids, large mandibular condyles, and a nasal/frontal suture that is anteriorly convex (Joyce and Lyson 2015).

General. The cranium is generally well preserved, despite minor crushing mainly affecting the right side of the specimen (Figs 2, 3). The right quadratojugal and right squamosal are missing. Portions of the right quadrate and paroccipital process of the right opisthotic dislocated from the remainder of the cranium but are preserved as an articulated fragment that was µCT scanned together with the skull, though not in the position it was originally found. The sutures of the cranium can be distinguished with relative ease in the µCT scan. The skull is about 65 mm long from the anterior tip of the nasals to the posterior end of the supraoccipital crest, and 48 mm wide between the outside edge of the mandibular condyles. The skull is wedge-shaped in dorsal view and possesses a distinct, pinched snout (Fig. 2A). The less deformed left side suggests that the orbits were oriented dorsolaterally. The upper temporal emargination protrudes anteriorly beyond the level of the anterior margin of the cavum tympani (Fig. 2B). The last three observations are in broad agreement with other baenodds (Joyce and Lyson 2015). The dorsal skull roof is decorated with fine crenulations, but distinct scute sulci appear to be absent.

Nasal. The nasals are flat and narrow elements that roof the nasal cavity (Fig. 2). In dorsal view, the nasal is longer than broad and contacts its counterpart medially and the frontals posteriorly and posteromedially. The nasal is prevented from contacting its counterpart for nearly half of its length posteriorly by an anterior extension of the frontal (Fig. 2A). This anterior process of the frontal also covers the posteromedial aspect of the nasal. Within the nasal cavity, the nasal contacts the prefrontal posterolaterally, but such a contact is prevented externally by an extended contact between the frontal and maxilla (Fig. 2C, E). On the uncrushed, left side of the skull, the apertura narium externa forms a posteriorly oriented slit starting from its dorsolateral margin. The slit extends posteriorly and reaches the frontal, thus preventing the nasal from contacting the maxilla (Fig. 2A). As preserved, the right nasal contacts the right maxilla along a straight contact, but deformation in combination with a lack of apparent articulation sites suggest that this is due to compression. The nasal of Denazinemys nodosa, therefore, differs from the more elongated nasal that contacts the maxilla of Eubaena cephalica (Gaffney 1972; Rollot et al. 2018), Goleremys mckennai (Hutchison 2004), and Saxochelys gilberti (Lyson et al. 2019).

Prefrontal. The prefrontals are well preserved despite some shearing on both sides. The dorsal plate is greatly reduced in size as in the majority of baenodds (Joyce and Lyson 2015). The dorsal plate of the prefrontal is developed as a small, rectangular lappet that forms the anterodorsal margin of the orbit (Fig. 2A, C, E). The dorsal process of the prefrontal contacts the maxilla anteriorly and the frontal dorsally and posteriorly. The dorsal process furthermore contacts the nasal within the roof of the nasal cavity, as in Eubaena cephalica (Rollot et al. 2018). The descending process of the prefrontal frames the orbit anteriorly and forms the anterior margin of the foramen interorbitale and the anterior half of the foramen orbito-nasale, which is posteriorly framed by the palatine. Anteriorly, the descending process of the prefrontal broadly contacts the maxilla ventrolaterally along a straight suture, the vomer posteroventrolaterally, and the palatine on both sides of the foramen orbito-nasale. A blunt, sheet-like ridge along the medial aspect of the descending process of the prefrontal might be apparent on the right side, but a constriction of the fissura ethmoidalis as that observed in some early branching baenids is not apparent in Denazinemys nodosa (Rollot et al. 2022a).

Frontal. The frontal is a flat and elongate element, trapezoidal in dorsal view, mediolaterally wider posteriorly than anteriorly (Fig. 2A, C–E). The frontal contacts the nasal anteriorly along a deeply concave suture, the maxilla anterolaterally, the dorsal process of the prefrontal lateroventrally, the postorbital posterolaterally, the parietal posteriorly, and its counterpart medially for its entire length. The frontoparietal suture is located posterior to the orbit. The left frontal likely has a minute contribution to the posterior margin of the slit-like opening located between the nasal and maxilla, which had previously not been noted (Lively 2016). The frontal bears a pointed anterior process that deeply protrudes between the nasals, preventing the latter to contact one another along their posterior half. At about two thirds of its length, the frontal is slightly expanded laterally to form the dorsal margin of the orbit (Fig. 2C, E). Ventrally, the frontal is thickened to form a low crista cranii that separates the orbit from the low but broad sulcus olfactorius. The crista cranii is not continuous with the parietal posteriorly.

Parietal. The parietals are complete but slightly damaged, mostly along the ventral aspect of their descending process (Fig. 2A). The parietal forms the anteromedial wall of the temporal fossa, the posterior margin of the foramen interorbitale, and the anterior and medial margin of the upper temporal emargination. The dorsal part of the parietal forms a thin plate of bone that is sightly broader anteriorly than posteriorly, but the combined width of the parietals is about as great as their length. The dorsal plate contacts the frontal anteriorly, the postorbital laterally, the supraoccipital posteriorly, and its counterpart medially. Within the upper temporal fossa, the vertical process of the parietal, or processus inferior parietalis, contacts the prootic laterally and the supraoccipital posteriorly. A distinct ridge extends posteroventrally along the lateral surface of the processus inferior parietalis, starting from the contact with the postorbital to nearly reach the ventral contact with the epipterygoid. Within the lower temporal fossa, the processus inferior parietalis contacts the pterygoid anteroventrally, the epipterygoid ventrally, again the pterygoid posteroventrally along the posterior margin of the foramen nervi trigemini, and the prootic posteriorly (Fig. 3). Within the braincase, the processus inferior parietalis additionally contacts the parabasisphenoid posteroventrally. Two finger-like processes of the parietal frame the anteroventral and posterodorsal margins of the trigeminal foramen and, independently from one another, contact the pterygoid ventrally. Although these contacts prevent the prootic from contributing to the external margin of the foramen nervi trigemini, as is the case in Boremys pulchra (Brinkman and Nicholls 1991), the prootic roofs the latter foramen from the inside, similar to the condition observed in Lakotemys australodakotensis (Rollot et al. 2022a). The parietal and epipterygoid jointly form a thickened ridge that runs diagonally from the dorsal skull roof to the articular surface of the quadrate just anteroventrally to the trigeminal foramen (Fig. 2B, C and E).

Postorbital. Despite some fractures, both postorbitals are overall well preserved. The anterior part of the postorbital is ventrally expanded as a mediolaterally thickened septum orbitotemporale (sensu Evers et al. 2020) that forms the posterior aspect of the fossa orbitalis and broadly rests on the jugal dorsally (Fig. 2A–E). The resulting, posteriorly constricted opening between the orbit and temporal fossa resembles the condition observed in other paracryptodires, but also pleurodires (Evers et al. 2020). Within the orbit, the postorbital mainly contacts the jugal ventrally, but additional contacts can be identified along the most posterior aspect of the orbital floor with the maxilla anterolaterally and the pterygoid posterolaterally (Fig. 2B, C, and E). Along the posteroventral corner of the right orbit, the postorbital contacts the maxilla anteroventrally, which prevents the jugal from contributing to the orbital margin. On the left side, small portions of the jugal are inserted between the postorbital and maxilla in some areas (Fig. 2D). These repeated slight exposures of the jugal are somewhat unusual in comparison to other paracryptodires that either lack a jugal contribution to the orbital margin, or exhibit a clear jugal contribution to that margin. The condition exhibited on the left side likely corresponds to a preservational artefact, and we interpret the bony arrangement on the right side as being correct (Fig. 2A and D). A contact between the maxilla and postorbital along the posteroventral margin of the orbit was also reported in Boremys pulchra (Brinkman and Nicholls 1991), Eubaena cephalica (Gaffney 1972; Rollot et al. 2018), and Saxochelys gilberti (Lyson et al. 2019).

The posterior part of the postorbital is developed as a flat and elongate piece of bone (Fig. 2). Although the posterior margin of both postorbitals is damaged, the intact margins of the surrounding elements strongly suggest that the postorbital broadly contributed to the upper temporal emargination. On the skull roof, the postorbital contacts the frontal anteromedially, the parietal medially, the jugal anterolaterally, the quadratojugal laterally, and the squamosal posterolaterally.

Jugal. The jugals are both damaged and their posterior portion is not preserved (Fig. 2C and E). The jugal is a small element that forms the anterodorsal margin of the cheek emargination. The right jugal preserves a small portion of that margin, indicating that the cheek emargination likely reached the level of the ventral margin of the orbit at the most. In lateral view, the jugal contacts the maxilla anteriorly and anteroventrally and the postorbital dorsally. A contact with the quadratojugal posteriorly is preserved on the left side only (Fig. 2E). The jugal forms a thick process medially that lies beneath the postorbital and is partially exposed within the orbit, where it contacts the maxilla anteriorly and medially along a V-shaped suture. The jugal contacts the postorbital dorsally. A small exposure of the jugal is apparent on the left side (Fig. 2A, D), but this is likely due to some damage or shearing, and the bony arrangement along the posteroventral corner of the right orbit appears to be the usual condition for DMNH EPV.64550 (see Postorbital above). Within the lower temporal fossa, the medial process of the jugal contacts the pterygoid posteromedially, anterior to the external process of the latter (Fig. 2B).

Quadratojugal. Only the left quadratojugal is preserved in DMNH EPV.64550 (Fig. 2A, C, and E). The quadratojugal is a flat, subtriangular element that forms the posterodorsal margin of the lower temporal emargination. The quadratojugal contacts the jugal anteriorly, the postorbital dorsally, the squamosal posterodorsally, and the quadrate posteriorly (Fig. 2E). A contribution of the quadratojugal to the margin of the cavum tympani is not apparent.

Squamosal. The right squamosal is missing in DMNH EPV.64550, but its left counterpart is entirely preserved, albeit crossed by various fractures (Fig. 2A, B and E, F). The squamosal forms the posterodorsal aspect of the skull and contributes to the posterodorsal rim of the cavum tympani, the posterolateral margin of the upper temporal emargination, and the posterior and lateral margins of a deep antrum postoticum (Fig. 2E). On the skull roof, the squamosal contacts the quadratojugal anterolaterally and the postorbital anteromedially, and broadly contacts the quadrate ventrally. Within the upper temporal fossa, the squamosal contacts the quadrate anteromedially and the paroccipital process of the opisthotic medially (Fig. 2A, F). The squamosal broadly covers the posterodorsolateral aspects of the quadrate to form a deep antrum postoticum. The ridge that runs from the posterior tip of the squamosal towards the paroccipital process is damaged on the left side of the skull. As a result, the pit behind the antrum postoticum, best seen in lateral view (Fig. 2E), for attachment of the M. depressor mandibulae is incomplete.

Premaxilla. The premaxilla forms the floor of the fossa nasalis and the ventral margin of the apertura narium externa (Fig. 2A–E). The premaxillae are visible in dorsal view, as in other eubaenines. The premaxilla contacts the vomer posteriorly, the maxilla posterolaterally, and its counterpart medially. The premaxillae form a relatively large, rounded opening along their median suture that resembles the intermaxillary foramen of trionychians (Fig. 2A, B). This foramen, perhaps the result of taphonomic damage, is not homologous with the foramen praepalatinum, as the latter is preserved along the most posterior aspect of the premaxilla. The foramen praepalatinum is mostly formed by the premaxilla, with contributions of the maxilla posterolaterally, as in Eubaena cephalica (Gaffney 1972; Rollot et al. 2018) but not other eubaenines for which this area is known (Gaffney 1972; Hutchison 2004). The premaxilla forms the anterior aspects of the labial margin, contributes only little to the triturating surfaces, and defines a distinct median tongue groove, much as in Stygiochelys estesi (Gaffney and Hiatt 1971), Chisternon undatum (Gaffney 1972), Eubaena cephalica (Gaffney 1972; Rollot et al. 2018), and Saxochelys gilberti (Lyson et al. 2019), but likely not Goleremys mckennai (Hutchison 2004). A lingual ridge is not present.

Maxilla. The maxilla forms the anterior and ventral margins of the orbit, the lateral margin of the apertura narium externa, the lateral wall of the fossa nasalis, minor aspects of the lateral margin of the foramen palatinum posterius, and floors the fossa orbitalis (Fig. 2A–E). The ascending process of the maxilla forms a thin sheet of bone bordered by the apertura narium externa anteriorly and the orbit posteriorly. The ascending process contacts the frontal dorsally and the prefrontal posteriorly. On the right side of the skull, the maxilla contacts the nasal, but this contact is likely due to shearing, as such a contact appears to be absent on the left. The maxilla contacts the premaxilla anteriorly. Within the fossa orbitalis, the maxilla contacts the descending process of the prefrontal anteromedially, the palatine medially, the pterygoid posteromedially, and the postorbital posterolaterally, and broadly underlies the jugal, which results in a V-shaped suture located just lateral for the foramen supramaxillare. The foramen is developed singularly on the right side, but is doubled on the left. In either case, the foramina are connected to a canal, that runs below the surface of the orbit and connects to a network of sub-canals that feed numerous nutritive foramina that are dispersed across the ventral side of the maxilla (Fig. 2B). The maxilla forms triturating surfaces that broaden posteriorly, as in Stygiochelys estesi (Gaffney and Hiatt 1971), Eubaena cephalica (Gaffney 1972; Rollot et al. 2018), Boremys pulchra (Brinkman and Nicholls 1991), Goleremys mckennai (Hutchison 2004), Saxochelys gilberti (Lyson et al. 2019), and Palatobaena spp. (Archibald and Hutchison 1979; Lyson et al. 2009; Lyson et al. 2021). Anteriorly, the triturating surface bears a distinct lingual ridge that delineates a broad tongue groove. The medial margin of the triturating surface is slightly thickened, but does not form a distinct ridge, much as in Eubaena cephalica (Gaffney 1972; Rollot et al. 2018). In ventral view, the maxilla contacts the premaxilla anteriorly, the vomer anteromedially, the palatine medially and posteromedially, and the pterygoid posteriorly.

Palatine. The palatine is a laminar bone that forms most of the foramen palatinum posterius and the posterior half of the foramen orbito-nasale (Fig. 2B). The palatine contacts the prefrontal anterodorsally, the vomer medially along a straight suture for most of its length, the maxilla ventrolaterally, and the pterygoid posteriorly. The palatine only contributes minorly to the triturating surface. A contact with the jugal is absent, which differs from the condition observed in Eubaena cephalica (Rollot et al. 2018). The right palatine has a short contact with the descending process of the right parietal within the interorbital fossa, but such a contact is not present on the left side of the skull.

Vomer. The vomer is a single, elongated, and narrow bone (Fig. 2). The vomer floors the posterior part of the nasal cavity and forms the medial wall of the internal nares. The vomer contacts the premaxilla anteriorly, the maxilla anterolaterally, the prefrontal dorsolaterally, and the pterygoid posteriorly. The vomer also contacts the palatine laterally for most of its length, which prevents the latter from contacting its counterpart. The dorsolateral processes of the vomer for articulation with the descending process of the prefrontals are very low, nearly nonexistent. Dorsally, a narrow sulcus vomeri is apparent along the posterior half of the bone.

Pterygoid. The pterygoids are well preserved with the exception of minor cracks. The anterior half of the pterygoid contacts the vomer anteromedially, the palatine anteriorly, the maxilla anterolaterally, and the jugal anterodorsolaterally (Fig. 2B, C, E). The pterygoid forms a reduced anterior process that barely protrudes between the vomer and palatine and extends only to the level of the posterior margin of the foramen palatinum posterius (Fig. 2B). Such a reduced anterior process contrasts with the elongate process of pleurosternids (Evers et al. 2020; Rollot et al. 2021) and early branching baenids (Evers et al. 2021; Rollot et al. 2022a; Rollot et al. 2022b), but resembles the condition of more derived baenids (Gaffney and Hiatt 1971; Gaffney 1972; Archibald and Hutchison 1979; Brinkman 2003; Hutchison 2004; Lyson and Joyce 2009a; Lyson and Joyce 2009b; Lyson and Joyce 2010; Lively 2015; Lyson et al. 2019; Lyson et al. 2021). The pterygoid forms a minor portion of the foramen palatinum posterius, which is apparent within its posterolateral corner. The pterygoid forms a well-defined external pterygoid process (Fig. 2C, E). The well-developed vertical flange has a broad contact with the overlying postorbital. The posterior half of the pterygoid has an elongate contact with the parabasisphenoid medially and the quadrate laterally (Figs 2B, 4). The pterygoid also contacts the basioccipital posteromedially for most of the length of the latter bone as in other baenids (Gaffney and Hiatt 1971; Gaffney 1972; Archibald and Hutchison 1979; Brinkman and Nicholls 1993; Brinkman 2003; Hutchison 2004; Lipka et al. 2006; Lyson and Joyce 2009a; Lyson and Joyce 2009b; Lively 2015; Lyson et al. 2019; Lyson et al. 2021; Rollot et al. 2022a; Rollot et al. 2022b) but which contrasts with the condition observed in pleurosternids (Evans and Kemp 1976; Gaffney 1979; Rollot et al. 2021). Posteriorly, the pterygoid forms a deep pterygoid fossa and the anterolateral half of the basioccipital tubercle. Within the lower temporal fossa, the pterygoid contacts the descending process of the parietal anterodorsally, the epipterygoid dorsally, and the prootic posterodorsally behind the foramen nervi trigemini, of which it forms the posterior margin (Fig. 3). The preserved portion of the pterygoid shows that the crista pterygoidea was likely low, but this area is difficult to assess given the shearing that is apparent in this area. Within the cavum acustico-jugulare, the pterygoid contacts the prootic anteriorly and anteromedially, the quadrate laterally, the exoccipital and basioccipital posteromedially. A contact with the processus interfenestralis of the opisthotic was likely present dorsomedially as well, but can only partially be observed on the right side because of the shearing that affects the skull. The canalis cavernosus is mostly formed by the pterygoid and the prootic only forms the dorsal margin of the canal (Fig. 4). The foramen cavernosum is formed by the pterygoid and prootic and leads into the sulcus cavernosus anteriorly, which is formed by the pterygoid laterally and ventrally and minor contributions of the parabasisphenoid medially.

A short, anteroposteriorly oriented groove is located at about mid-length along the suture between the pterygoid and parabasisphenoid (Fig. 2B). This groove is inferred to have housed the internal carotid artery and two foramina can be identified along its posterolateral and anterior margins (Fig. 4). The posterolateral foramen is the foramen distalis nervi vidiani, which serves as a passage for the vidian nerve from the canalis pro ramo nervi vidiani to the carotid groove (Fig. 4). The foramen distalis nervi vidiani is formed by the pterygoid only, albeit located just lateral to the pterygoid-parabasisphenoid suture. The anterior foramen is the foramen posterius canalis carotici interni, which leads into the canalis caroticus internus. Just anterolateral to the foramen posterius canalis carotici interni, the canalis nervus vidianus bifurcates from the canalis caroticus internus and extends anteriorly through the pterygoid. The canalis nervus vidianus can be traced anteriorly close to the level of the suture between the pterygoid and palatine, just posterior to the foramen palatinum posterius, but crushing of the skull prevents us to determine the exact location and bony contributions to the foramen anterius canalis nervi vidiani. The canalis caroticus internus becomes the canalis caroticus basisphenoidalis just anterior to the split between the former canal and the canalis nervus vidianus, and extends anteromedially through the parabasisphenoid. The canalis caroticus basisphenoidalis joins the sella turcica by means of the foramen anterius canalis carotici basisphenoidalis, which is formed by the parabasisphenoid. The canalis caroticus lateralis, when present, typically extends anteriorly along the pterygoid-parabasisphenoid suture and joins the sulcus cavernosus. In DMNH EPV.64550, we are not able to identify any canal in this position, and the canalis caroticus lateralis is, therefore, considered absent in Denazinemys nodosa. The circulatory pattern of Denazinemys nodosa is overall very similar to that of Eubaena cephalica (Rollot et al. 2018), with the exception that the foramen distalis nervi vidiani is not ventrally exposed in Eubaena cephalica.

Epipterygoid. The epipterygoid is a small, rod-like bone, which is located anteroventral to the trigeminal foramen, but does not contribute to its formation (Figs 2B, C, E, 3). A notable ascending process is lacking. The epipterygoid contacts the pterygoid medially and ventrally and the parietal dorsally and anteriorly. A minor concavity at its posterior end marks remnants of the palatoquadrate cartilage (see Discussion for the known distribution of epipterygoids among baenodds).

Quadrate. The quadrate is a large bone that forms most of the middle ear, in particular the evenly rounded cavum tympani, the medial aspects of the antrum postoticum, the posteriorly open incisura columella auris, the lateral wall of the cavum acustico-jugulare, and the mandibular condyle (Fig. 2). Within the upper temporal fossa, the quadrate contacts the prootic anteromedially, the supraoccipital medially, the opisthotic posteromedially, and the squamosal posteriorly (Fig. 2A). The contact between the quadrate and supraoccipital is extensive and prevents the opisthotic from contributing to the margin of the foramen stapedio-temporale, as in Eubaena cephalica (Rollot et al. 2018) and Saxochelys gilberti (Lyson et al. 2019), but not Chisternon undatum (Gaffney 1972) and Stygiochelys estesi (Gaffney 1972), in which the contact is either extremely reduced or completely absent, respectively. On the lateral skull surface, the quadrate forms a broad, C-shaped suture with the quadratojugal anteriorly and contacts the squamosal dorsally (Fig. 2E). In ventral view, the quadrate has an elongate contact with the posterior process of the pterygoid medially (Fig. 2B). An anterior contact with the epipterygoid is hindered by a rounded cavity that likely held the remnants of the palatoquadrate cartilage. The mandibular condyles are small, ventrally oriented, and consist of two concave facets, the lateral of which is larger than the medial one. The foramen stapedio-temporale is formed by the quadrate laterally, the prootic anteriorly, and the supraoccipital laterally and posterolaterally (Fig. 2A). The opisthotic has a minor contribution to the right canalis stapedio-temporalis internally, much as in Eubaena cephalica (Rollot et al. 2018). The quadrate and prootic also jointly form the processus trochlearis oticum, which is developed as a relatively broad ridge-like protrusion. Within the cavum acustico-jugulare, the quadrate contacts the prootic anterodorsomedially, the opisthotic posterodorsomedially, and the pterygoid ventromedially, and forms the lateral margin of the aditus canalis stapedio-temporalis.

Prootic. The prootic forms the medial half of the processus trochlearis oticum and the medial wall of the canalis stapedio-temporalis (Fig. 2A). The prootic is excluded from the lateral margin of the foramen nervi trigemini by a contact of the parietal with the pterygoid (Fig. 3B), but contributes to the foramen internally within the skull (Fig. 3C), as has previously been observed for Lakotemys australodakotensis (Rollot et al. 2022a). The prootic contacts the parietal anteriorly, the supraoccipital posteromedially, the quadrate posteriorly and posterolaterally, the pterygoid ventrolaterally, and the parabasisphenoid ventromedially. The prootic forms the anterior half of the cavum labyrinthicum, canalis semicircularis anterior, and canalis semicircularis horizontalis, and the anterior margin of the hiatus acusticus and fenestra ovalis. We are not able to determine if the fenestra ovalis is fully surrounded by bone because of damage to the processus interfenestralis of the opisthotic on both sides. The prootic also forms the dorsal margin of the canalis cavernosus and foramen cavernosum. The canalis nervus facialis extends laterally though the prootic from the fossa acustico-facialis and joins the medial margin of the canalis cavernosus (Fig. 4). The geniculate ganglion, i.e. where the facial nerve splits into the vidian and hyomandibular nerves, is inferred to have been located within the canalis cavernosus. The canalis pro ramo nervi vidiani, which held the vidian nerve, extends ventromedially from the canalis cavernosus through the pterygoid and joins the carotid groove by means of the foramen distalis nervi vidiani. The vidian nerve is then inferred to have extended anteriorly alongside the internal carotid artery within the carotid groove into the canalis caroticus internus, and split from the latter to enter the canalis nervus vidianus just anterior to the foramen posterius canalis carotici interni. The canalis nervus vidianus is formed by the pterygoid.

Opisthotic. The opisthotics are damaged – the left lacks the processus interfenestralis and the right lacks most of the paroccipital process (Fig. 2A, B, F). The opisthotic forms the posterior margin of the hiatus acusticus and the posterior half of the cavum labyrinthicum, canalis semicircularis horizontalis, and canalis semicircularis posterior. Anteriorly, within the upper temporal fossa, the opisthotic contacts the supraoccipital medially and the quadrate laterally. A broad anterior contact with the prootic is hidden from dorsal view by a sheet of bone formed by the supraoccipital that laterally contacts the quadrate (Fig. 2A, F). The paroccipital process of the opisthotic forms the dorsal rim of the fenestra postotica, which is fully confluent with the foramen jugulare posterius, and contacts the exoccipital medially and squamosal laterally. The right opisthotic also slightly contributes to the posterior wall of the canalis stapedio-temporalis. Although the processus interfenestralis is absent on the left side and badly damaged on the right, we are able to assess most of its bony contributions. A contact with the pterygoid might have occurred ventrally, but the apparent contact on the right side seems to be the result of crushing. The foramen internum nervi glossopharyngei and foramen externum nervi glossopharyngei of the glossopharyngeal nerve (IX) are both preserved along the dorsal base of the processus interfenestralis. The processus interfenestralis forms the posterior margin of the fenestra ovalis but, as mentioned above (see Prootic), damage prevents us from determining if the fenestra ovalis was fully surrounded by bone. The processus interfenestralis also forms the dorsal margin of the foramen jugulare anterius, which is otherwise formed by the exoccipital and a small anterior contribution from the pterygoid. As preserved, the fenestra perilymphatica has a slit-like appearance, but this may be a result of compression.

Supraoccipital. The supraoccipital is complete, although some damage affects the crista supraoccipitalis, which is fragmented into two bony pieces (Fig. 2A, C, E, F). The supraoccipital forms the posteromedial tip of the skull roof, where it is only slightly exposed. The supraoccipital also forms the medial margin of the foramen stapedio-temporale, the dorsal margin of the hiatus acusticus, and the dorsal margin of the foramen magnum, and roofs the cavum cranii. The crista supraoccipitalis is moderately tall and thin and, despite some damage and slight displacement, appears to be complete, and the crista barely protrudes beyond the level of the foramen magnum. The supraoccipital contacts the parietal anterodorsally, the prootic anterolaterally, the quadrate laterally, the opisthotic posterolaterally, and the exoccipital posteriorly. The supraoccipital roofs the cavum labyrinthicum and forms the posterior half of the canalis semicircularis anterior and the anterior half of the canalis semicircularis posterior. The foramen aquaducti vestibuli is not preserved.

Basioccipital. The basioccipital is an unpaired element that floors the posterior portion of the cavum cranii and forms the ventral margin of the foramen magnum and a low crista dorsalis basioccipitalis (Fig. 2B, F). In ventral view, the basioccipital is trapezoidal in shape and contacts the parabasisphenoid anteriorly and the posterior process of the pterygoid laterally for all its length. The parabasisphenoid, however, underlaps the anterior fifth of the basioccipital by means of a thin sheet of bone. Together with the pterygoid, the basioccipital forms two well-defined tubercula basioccipitale, which are buttressed from above by the exoccipital. The right exoccipital minutely contributes to the articular surface of the condylus occipitalis. The left exoccipital is damaged in this region, but a minor contribution seems plausible on this side as well. Two foramina basioccipitale are present on the ventral surface of the basioccipital, as in Eubaena cephalica (Rollot et al. 2018).

Exoccipital. The exoccipital forms the lateral wall of the cavum cranii, the lateral margin of the foramen magnum, the medial margin of the foramen jugulare anterius, and the medial wall of the recessus scalae tympani (Fig. 2A, F). The exoccipital closely approaches the condylus occipitalis and a minor contribution of the right exoccipital to the articular surface of the latter is visible. The same region is damaged for the left exoccipital and no contribution to the articular surface of the condylus occipitalis is visible. However, it seems plausible that a minor contribution was present on this side as well. The exoccipital contacts the supraoccipital dorsally, the opisthotic laterally, the pterygoid ventrolaterally and the basioccipital ventrally, and buttresses the tuberculum basioccipitale from above (Fig. 2F). Along the braincase wall, we are able to identify 4 small foramina on the medial surface of the exoccipital, but only one larger foramen on its external surface. Cranial nerves X, XI, and XII typically branch off the brain as multiple small branches that merge shortly after having left the brain (Soliman 1964; Kardong 2012). The arrangement observed in DMNH EPV.64550 perfectly illustrates this condition, in which 4 small hypoglossal nerve branches (XII) depart from the brain to enter the exoccipital through separate foramina, and merge within the latter bone to exit the skull by means of a single, enlarged foramen nervi hypoglossi. Unlike in Eubaena cephalica (Rollot et al. 2018), the exoccipitals and the basioccipital are clearly distinguishable in the CT scan, which suggests that this specimen likely belongs to a skeletally immature specimen.

Parabasisphenoid. The parabasisphenoid is a thick triangular bone that forms the ventral margin of the hiatus acusticus, the medial wall of the sulcus cavernosus, and most of the floor of the cavum cranii (Figs 2B, 4). Ventrally, the parabasisphenoid broadly contacts the pterygoids laterally along straight sutures. The posterior contact with the basioccipital is transverse, but a surficial lamina of bone, likely homologous to the parasphenoid (Sterli et al. 2010), underlaps the basioccipital to yield a concavely curved suture. The parabasisphenoid otherwise contacts the prootic dorsolaterally. The rostrum basisphenoidale is flat and short, only representing about one third of the total length of the parabasisphenoid, and contacts the pterygoids ventrally (Fig. 2B). At the posterior limit of the rostrum basisphenoidale is the sella turcica, in which the two foramina anterius canalis carotici basisphenoidalis are located (Fig. 4). The sella turcica is overhung by a tall dorsum sellae. Distinct retractor bulbi pits are not apparent. The short, wing-like clinoid processes, as seen in the 3D models, partially roof the sulcus cavernosus. The foramen posterius canalis nervi abducentis is located on the dorsal surface of the parabasisphenoid at about mid-length between the dorsum sellae and the posterior end of the bone. The canalis nervus abducentis is mostly formed by the parabasisphenoid, but the pterygoid forms the lateral margin of the right foramen anterius canalis nervi abducentis, as in the pleurosternid Pleurosternon bullockii (Evers et al. 2020) and the early branching baenid Arundelemys dardeni (Evers et al. 2021). Ventrally, the parabasisphenoid forms the medial portion of most of the carotid groove, but the foramen posterius canalis carotici interni is only formed by the pterygoid, albeit extremely close to the pterygoid-parabasisphenoid suture. Shortly anterior to the foramen posterius canalis carotici interni, the canalis caroticus internus becomes the canalis caroticus basisphenoidalis, which is formed by the parabasisphenoid. The basipterygoid process is absent.

Shell. The shell associated with the skull was reassembled, as it was disarticulated during burial. Although some bones are missing, those that remain are preserved in three dimensions (Figs 5, 6). The surface of the carapace is covered by numerous welts (Fig. 5A). Elongate welts are oriented anteroposteriorly, roughly parallel to the sagittal plane, and most densely arranged over the medial half of the costals. Most sulci can be traced with ease, with the exception of those in the nuchal area, which are difficult to discern. The shell is highly vaulted. The posterior margin of the carapace is scalloped and exhibits a broad pygal notch. The anterior margin is lightly scalloped as well. The skin-scute sulcus runs along the margins of the visceral side of both carapace and plastron (Fig. 6).

The carapace likely consists of a nuchal, preneural, nine neural elements of which eight are interpreted as regular and one as supernumerary, a suprapygal, a pygal, eight pairs of costals, and twelve pairs of peripherals (Fig. 5A). The preneural and neural I have four sides and only contact costal I laterally. Neurals II–V are elongate, hexagonal, and have short anterolateral sides that contact the anterior costal. Neurals VI and VII are missing, but can be inferred to have been short, hexagonal elements. The surrounding elements suggest the presence of a short, irregular neural that was squeezed between neurals VII and neural VIII, which we do not count as a full element of the neural series. Neural VIII is an elongate hexagon with short anterolateral sides. The suprapygal is crescent-shaped, has four contacts, and is about the size of the preneural. The pygal is much broader than long, forms much of the posterior margin of the shell, and exhibits a deep anterior concavity for articulation with the suprapygal. As in most baenodds, costals I–IV are large elements, while costals V–VIII are reduced in size. Costal I is in contact with four peripherals and its rib inserts laterally into the fourth peripheral element. As the first costal rib seems to insert into the third peripheral universally among turtles (Joyce and Rollot 2020), this suggests that the small peripherals at the very front of the series are supernumerary elements relative to other turtles. To avoid propagating incorrect homology, we highlight the first pair of elements as supernumerary peripherals and start counting the regular peripheral series with the second element. As other Denazinemys nodosa shells only display three peripherals associated with costal I (Wiman 1933; Lichtig and Lucas 2015), this could be used as evidence for a distinct species. However, as the shell of baenids often exhibits irregular bone or scute arrangements (e.g., Wiman 1933; Gaffney 1972; Joyce and Lyson 2015), we interpret this as an anomaly until it can be consistently demonstrated among additional individuals. A peripheral count of 12 is reported for numerous baenids in the literature (e.g., Gaffney 1972) and is used as character evidence in baenid trees going back to Gaffney and Meylan (1988), but we find it doubtful that this characteristic exists in the first place (see Discussion below). The nuchal is a narrow, trapezoidal element that laterally contacts peripheral I on the right side only. The supernumerary peripheral is a small, triangular element that posteriorly contacts costal I on the left side only. As the axillary buttress reaches the very front of the shell, the posterior margin of peripheral I is V-shaped in cross section. The inguinal buttress is only partially preserved, but the posterior peripherals, at least peripherals VIII–XI, are flat in cross section.

The carapace was likely covered by five vertebrals, one pair of prepleurals, four pairs of pleurals, and twelve pairs of regular marginals, and one pair of supernumerary marginals (Fig. 5A). We are not able to determine the number of cervicals beyond one. Vertebral I is constricted anteriorly by the adjacent prepleurals. Vertebrals II–IV have six contacts, but are mostly square to rectangular in shape. Vertebral V is constricted posteriorly by marginals XII and contributes to the margin of the shell. The intervertebral sulci are located above neural I, III, V, and VIII, while the interpleural one are located above costals II, IV, VI, and VIII.

The plastron consists of an entoplastron and paired epi-, hyo-, meso-, hypo-, and xiphiplastra (Figs 5B, 6B). The anterior plastral lobe is short and triangular, the bridge region broad, and the posterior lobe short, but squared. The entoplastron is diamond-shaped in external view, but notably T-shaped in visceral view due to the development of a broad posterior entoplastral process. The mesoplastra show a broad, slightly asymmetric midline contact as in Compsemys (Gaffney, 1972). The hyoplastra form large, winglike axillary buttresses that reach anteriorly to contact the posterior corner of peripheral I and then articulate with nearly the full width of costal I from below. The hypoplastra similarly form large, wing-like inguinal buttresses that articulate with a broad ridge formed at the contact of costals V and VI.

The plastron was likely once covered by paired gulars, extragulars, humerals, pectorals, abdominals, femorals, and anals (Fig. 5B). The gulars and extragulars are relatively small elements that are oriented transversely and have midline contacts with their counterparts. The extragular only barely covers the most anterior tip of the entoplastron. The humeral-pectoral sulcus is rounded and located far behind the entoplastron. The femoral-anal sulcus is omega-shaped and crosses onto the hypoplastron. The exact number of inframarginals is not clear, but a complete series was certainly present that separated the carapacial scutes from contacting the plastral ones.